Mother tongues in danger
After reading the letter “Two lessons from Sri Lanka” (Letter, July 31, page 8), my heart was filled with sadness. This feeling was caused by the words: “Why don’t you talk to each other in your mother tongue, since there are no foreigners joining in your conversation?”
These words reminded me of our own situation in Taiwan. Taiwanese have become used to talking to each other in Mandarin Chinese, instead of our mother tongues.
I am a member of the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan (PCT). Within our church community, our mother tongue is used extensively: The Bible and hymn books in our church are in our mother tongue and sermons are delivered in our mother language. It seems common sense in this religious community to use the worshipers’ mother tongue.
However, this is not the case in the Mandarin-speaking churches.
Thanks to the PCT, I can speak my mother tongue very fluently and freely. I am very fortunate.
However, even though Taiwanese society has been opening up, the Mandarin Chinese language still holds a monopoly in our daily lives. This is because we have been ruled mostly by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which forced us to subject to the policy of “no mother tongue use” (我不說方言) for several decades. This policy has had a huge influence on the way we view and value our native languages.
People still do not dare speak their mother tongues, or fear that they will be ridiculed for being part of an “inferior” culture and not identifying with the “higher” Chinese culture.
Even though the government has in recent years pushed ahead with the movement to preserve our mother tongues, a sense of inferiority is still deeply instilled in our hearts.
Someone once said that in Taiwan, “Taiwanese is an outpatient, Hakka has been hospitalized and Aboriginal languages are in the ICU.”
If we do not take care, our native languages risk slowly disappearing.
Gray Hsu
Greater Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath