The government has successfully amended the law to relax legal restrictions on beef imports containing residue of ractopamine. Considering the entire process surrounding this heated dispute, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration really needs to take a moment to reflect and make improvements.
The government has repeatedly promised to ensure clear labeling of beef products so that consumers can avoid buying and eating certain products. This may seem feasible enough, but with the abundance of marketing channels and an inefficient government, implementation will prove difficult and it will be pretty much impossible for the public to put their minds at ease.
If the government wants to control every domestic distribution link for beef containing the leanness-enhancing drug, it must enforce strict labeling of beef so that consumers have a choice, it must also implement a system for tracking beef products, issue heavy fines to retailers and suppliers violating regulations and should ensure repeat violators are held criminally liable. These measures are necessary if the government wants to regain the public’s trust. More importantly, they are all in line with international standards.
Since the UN’s Codex Alimentarius Commission voted to pass maximum residue levels (MRLs) of ractopamine and the government has guaranteed that beef and pork will be handled separately, it would be difficult for farmers to regain the openness of the past simply by taking to the streets to voice their dissatisfaction.
Apart from waiting for the next election to show the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) the consequences of not listening to majority opinion, the farming industry could use the way in which controls on beef were relaxed as a bargaining chip during upcoming international trade negotiations. If Taiwan’s farmers do not want to be exploited, they have to break away from this protectionist government and the temptation of China’s policy-driven purchases of Taiwan’s surplus agricultural products. Taiwan’s farmers need to become self-reliant.
As cheaper foreign agricultural products put more pressure on the domestic agriculture market because of free-trade agreement talks, coupled with the government’s habitual use of short-term subsidies to save farmers, Taiwan’s agriculture industry is facing a gradual demise. The only choice farmers have is to rely on themselves to survive with dignity. The power of the individual certainly has its limits, but the power of dozens or hundreds of farmers working together would definitely be a force to be reckoned with, and it would also alter the tragic fate Taiwan’s farmers have been assigned to for so long, while also shaking up things in Taiwan’s agricultural policy department.
Food safety concerns have already become a sort of global mindset and this offers a critical opportunity for Taiwanese agriculture that has been restricted by its small-scale operations for so long. Taiwan’s farmers have traditionally fended for themselves at the individual level, with some engrossed in a pursuit of their own ideals, making it difficult to deal with competition from large-scale farmers. Farmers need to be intrepid in freeing themselves from the shackles of a reliance on the government when dealing with outside competition and make food safety a universal motto for Taiwan’s farming industry.
Taiwanese must take the initiative to meet this goal and bring farmers together. The most suitable candidates for the job include farmers and agricultural experts who have been given outstanding farming awards, or local entrepreneurs who have useful ideas and are passionate about helping. These people should also be regularly exchanging their experiences and what they have learned about production and marketing, as well as researching, discussing and inviting experts to help with certain problems, for example, blight or epidemics.
The most important thing is to clamp down on the use of illegal drugs, growth hormones, antibiotics and preservatives and follow the withdrawal period regulations for legal drugs.
Since there is no real consensus about modes of production and related concepts, it is inevitable that the process of negotiation and compromise will be an arduous one, but for the sake of survival there must be a sense of reciprocity and mutual support. As soon as there is enough positive feedback from the public, consumers will undoubtedly be willing to pay higher prices for safer agricultural products.
Once this happens, Taiwan’s farmers can become self-reliant and set themselves apart from foreign producers of cheap agricultural goods tainted by food safety concerns and then regain their dignity by finally ceasing to expect the government to step in and show concern. This is an entirely realistic goal. Just look at the farmers in Montville, Maine, who came together several years back and voted to adopt a town ordinance banning the use of genetically modified plants. It is just a matter of people coming together and making an effort.
So much significant change in the world starts out small and gradually catches on. Instead of staying angry and growing impatient, farmers should have more confidence in themselves.
By standing up for reliable safety and quality anything is possible.
Lee Wu-chung is a professor of agricultural economics.
Translated by Kyle Jeffcoat
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
RSS