The government has successfully amended the law to relax legal restrictions on beef imports containing residue of ractopamine. Considering the entire process surrounding this heated dispute, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration really needs to take a moment to reflect and make improvements.
The government has repeatedly promised to ensure clear labeling of beef products so that consumers can avoid buying and eating certain products. This may seem feasible enough, but with the abundance of marketing channels and an inefficient government, implementation will prove difficult and it will be pretty much impossible for the public to put their minds at ease.
If the government wants to control every domestic distribution link for beef containing the leanness-enhancing drug, it must enforce strict labeling of beef so that consumers have a choice, it must also implement a system for tracking beef products, issue heavy fines to retailers and suppliers violating regulations and should ensure repeat violators are held criminally liable. These measures are necessary if the government wants to regain the public’s trust. More importantly, they are all in line with international standards.
Since the UN’s Codex Alimentarius Commission voted to pass maximum residue levels (MRLs) of ractopamine and the government has guaranteed that beef and pork will be handled separately, it would be difficult for farmers to regain the openness of the past simply by taking to the streets to voice their dissatisfaction.
Apart from waiting for the next election to show the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) the consequences of not listening to majority opinion, the farming industry could use the way in which controls on beef were relaxed as a bargaining chip during upcoming international trade negotiations. If Taiwan’s farmers do not want to be exploited, they have to break away from this protectionist government and the temptation of China’s policy-driven purchases of Taiwan’s surplus agricultural products. Taiwan’s farmers need to become self-reliant.
As cheaper foreign agricultural products put more pressure on the domestic agriculture market because of free-trade agreement talks, coupled with the government’s habitual use of short-term subsidies to save farmers, Taiwan’s agriculture industry is facing a gradual demise. The only choice farmers have is to rely on themselves to survive with dignity. The power of the individual certainly has its limits, but the power of dozens or hundreds of farmers working together would definitely be a force to be reckoned with, and it would also alter the tragic fate Taiwan’s farmers have been assigned to for so long, while also shaking up things in Taiwan’s agricultural policy department.
Food safety concerns have already become a sort of global mindset and this offers a critical opportunity for Taiwanese agriculture that has been restricted by its small-scale operations for so long. Taiwan’s farmers have traditionally fended for themselves at the individual level, with some engrossed in a pursuit of their own ideals, making it difficult to deal with competition from large-scale farmers. Farmers need to be intrepid in freeing themselves from the shackles of a reliance on the government when dealing with outside competition and make food safety a universal motto for Taiwan’s farming industry.
Taiwanese must take the initiative to meet this goal and bring farmers together. The most suitable candidates for the job include farmers and agricultural experts who have been given outstanding farming awards, or local entrepreneurs who have useful ideas and are passionate about helping. These people should also be regularly exchanging their experiences and what they have learned about production and marketing, as well as researching, discussing and inviting experts to help with certain problems, for example, blight or epidemics.
The most important thing is to clamp down on the use of illegal drugs, growth hormones, antibiotics and preservatives and follow the withdrawal period regulations for legal drugs.
Since there is no real consensus about modes of production and related concepts, it is inevitable that the process of negotiation and compromise will be an arduous one, but for the sake of survival there must be a sense of reciprocity and mutual support. As soon as there is enough positive feedback from the public, consumers will undoubtedly be willing to pay higher prices for safer agricultural products.
Once this happens, Taiwan’s farmers can become self-reliant and set themselves apart from foreign producers of cheap agricultural goods tainted by food safety concerns and then regain their dignity by finally ceasing to expect the government to step in and show concern. This is an entirely realistic goal. Just look at the farmers in Montville, Maine, who came together several years back and voted to adopt a town ordinance banning the use of genetically modified plants. It is just a matter of people coming together and making an effort.
So much significant change in the world starts out small and gradually catches on. Instead of staying angry and growing impatient, farmers should have more confidence in themselves.
By standing up for reliable safety and quality anything is possible.
Lee Wu-chung is a professor of agricultural economics.
Translated by Kyle Jeffcoat
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS