A few days ago, the Institute of Economics at Academia Sinica announced that it had adjusted the economic growth forecast for this year downward to 1.94 percent, halving the forecast it made six months ago. This news shocked many people.
However, looking back, nothing that major happened over the past half year. In November last year, amid the European debt crisis, the then-Greek prime minister George Papandreou stepped down, declaring that he was unable to solve the national debt problem. However, since then things have not spun further out of control. Shrinking demand in the US and China was expected and there has not been any news to generate overly pessimistic feelings about the economy. Thus, Academia Sinica’s economic growth forecast cut would seem to confirm past widespread worries about the economy and there is no real need to overreact to this news.
Several other research institutes will announce adjustments to their economic growth projections in the near future and they are likely to also be adjusted downward, probably in an attempt to correct the overly optimistic forecasts that were made at the end of last year.
Regardless of how much they are adjusted down, they probably will not drop as much as President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) approval ratings. It would seem safe to say that in the last half year, Taiwan has woken up from an overly optimistic dream.
Looking at things from a slightly different angle, maybe these forecasts that have now dropped to less than 2 percent, will stop financial and economic officials from concentrating too much on technical issues — like keeping economic growth above 3 or 4 percent — and instead direct their attention to the tasks of economic development and reform that they should be focusing on.
In the past decade, it is obvious how the pace of economic change has quickened. When the 2008 financial crisis first hit, academics and experts issued unprecedented crisis predictions. However, with the help of expansionary policies enacted by government’s around the world, economies returned to normal rather quickly. However, these panic-driven expansionary policies helped plant the seeds for future debt problems for many countries.
While current economic forecasts still do not look good, there is no need to resort to excessive use of short-term stimulus packages. Looking at things in terms of expanding domestic demand, it is possible to see that the government has not been involved in any large public infrastructure projects for a long time now. The need for flood prevention and energy savings are as plain as day — the best financial policy then would be for the government to invest in the necessary infrastructure projects.
There is no need to be too pessimistic, but at the same time we cannot afford to be overly optimistic. We need to carefully evaluate the plans that were raised before, when we were very optimistic.
The extra legislative session being held this week will most likely include discussions on the proposed capital gains tax. It is obvious that a law that promotes the idea of tax justice will not be received well by investors. Many people can be expected to cite the importance of economic growth and demand that the capital gains tax not be imposed so as to avoid making the economic situation even worse. If the government insists on passing the tax in such an atmosphere, it will be amended and changed and will end up as some unsightly mess.
We would do well to ask ourselves whether or not the rushed proposal that is the capital gains tax was not a result of excessive optimism. It would also be best to let this law, which is so important for tax reform, go through a more careful review process to allow more discussion and suggestions.
Here, I would like to call on Ma, as many other people have already done, to hold a national economic conference. Ever since Ma has been in power, his policymaking process has been incomprehensible to outsiders and it would seem that only a very limited number of people are involved in the actual decisionmaking process.
While I have said that there is no need to overreact to the major drop in economic growth, this remains an issue that the government and opposition parties should discuss together. That would also offer the public a chance to evaluate the current government-oppostion standoff.
However, the last time a national economic conference was held was 11 years ago, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had been in office for only a brief spell and was trying to work through economic problems. Having just been re-elected, Ma should be able to set a new standard if he were willing to call a national conference to gather a wide range of opinions.
Liu Ruey-hua is a professor of economics at National Tsing Hua University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath