High-street banks have long promised to go the extra mile for their customers, but none of them can purport to offer the kind of service private banks do.
Coutts recalls a story when a client dropped his wallet over the side of his yacht. One satellite-phone call later and the bank couriered out cards and cash to the next port he was going to. Then there was the diabetic client who got straight off an aircraft and into back-to-back meetings. When he finally checked into his hotel, there was nothing on the menu he could eat, so he called his bank — obviously — which duly sent a taxi there, complete with restaurant recommendations.
Private banks even send their clients’ children on boot camps for offspring of the ultra-rich. AH Loder Advisers has an annual dog-sled expedition across the Arctic. While billed as leadership training, these trips are as much about ensuring the children stay with the bank when they inherit.
However, such service does not come cheap. Individuals have to have about £1 million (US$1.55 million) in investable assets before private banks will even deign to speak to them, though Coutts says this is flexible.
Beyond these perks, private banks emphasize personal service. Where a retail bank will take a cursory glance at your credit rating, a private banker will ask about a client’s family history and their “objectives for their wealth.” Instead of a Mumbai call center, customers will have the mobile number of their private banker, whom they can call at any hour of the day. It is hardly surprising; safeguarding the assets of so-called “high net-worth individuals,” who are often willing to pay a premium for secrecy, is highly lucrative. According to Tax Justice Network research, the top 10 private banks had more than US$6 trillion under management in 2010, up from US$2.3 trillion five years earlier.
Much of the appeal lies in their discretion. Switzerland has long been at the heart of the private banking industry, with its tradition of secrecy dating back to 1934, when it became a criminal offence for employees to pass on information about clients’ accounts to a third party, even government tax inspectors from other countries.
For years, governments turned a blind eye to their wealthiest citizens squirreling away their riches in such tax havens. However, since the global economic meltdown, cash-strapped governments are scrabbling around for revenue and Switzerland has been one of the first places they have looked.
The UK government has struck a deal with the Swiss authorities to try and claw back at least some money from tax evaders. Under this deal, UK residents with undeclared assets in Swiss banks will be able to make a one-off, “clear the slate” payment of 21 percent to 41 percent on their total assets and retain their anonymity. The Swiss will then levy a withholding tax on any future investment income and capital gains banked in Switzerland, set at 27 percent to 48 percent. That compares with the top 50 percent rate of tax for funds kept in UK-based banks, due to be cut to 45 percent as of next year.
Tax expert Richard Murphy says this means those wealthy enough to transfer their assets are getting off extremely lightly: “It’s extraordinary. It’s legal to hide your money from Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [HMRC] now. You can complete a tax return and not put your income on it if it’s hidden in a Swiss bank account. This is fundamentally wrong.”
He says it also creates a perverse incentive for the wealthy to move money out of the UK.
“It gives no opportunity for the Revenue to go back to these people, most of whom have been tax evading for years,” he adds. “This is rewarding past crimes.”
A spokesman for HMRC says it is still illegal to hide money anywhere. He agrees that a UK resident does not have to declare income in a Swiss account if they agree to pay the one-off levy, but says that income will be subject to the withholding tax, which could end up higher than the rate they would pay in the UK. The deal was needed to crack open tax evasion cases, he adds, and could generate £4 billion to £7 billion in revenue.
Germany has agreed a potential deal along the same lines as the UK, but it needs to be ratified by the German parliament and there is substantial opposition from individual states. That became clear last week when reports emerged that one state recently bought information from a whistleblower on potential tax evaders, which could blow a hole in the agreement.
North-Rhine Westphalia is said to have paid 3.5 million euros (US$4.2 million) for a CD purportedly containing the names of about 1,000 Germans with assets in the Zurich branch of Coutts.
Coutts has said: “Following thorough investigation, we have no evidence to suggest any such breach has taken place.”
This is not the first time such a CD has emerged. In 2010, several German states said they had bought CDs containing Swiss banking data, which led to thousands of Germans declaring their financial holdings to avoid going to jail.
The US has won more concessions, with a treaty allowing Washington to more easily identify US residents with undeclared Swiss bank accounts. It is also going after the banks themselves. The department of justice has charged Switzerland’s oldest private bank, Wegelin & Co, with helping US residents hide more than US$1.2 billion in secret accounts. It now has an ongoing investigation into 11 more Swiss financial firms and is discussing a settlement that could result in Swiss private banks handing over account data on thousands of US residents.
With banking secrecy increasingly under threat, private banks may have to organize ever more trips to the Arctic to keep their customers loyal.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing