Sixty-one years ago, a perceptive ambassador to the US and UN from Lebanon, Charles Malik, told a US college audience: “The challenges confronting the Western world are basically three: The challenge of communism, the challenge of the Rising East and the challenge of the internal forces of decay.”
In the ensuing years, the first challenge was met and communism defeated. The Soviet Union is no more, China has shucked communism in favor of what one wag called “market-Leninism” and North Korea is coming apart at the seams.
The Rising East, in the eyes of some Asia hands, should now be called the Risen East. Japan led the way with its economic surge and was followed by the “Four Tigers”: South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore. Today, China and India have started moving to the fore, with several Southeast Asian nations in their wake.
Now, to the West comes the menace of “the internal forces of decay.” Europe, save for Germany, led by the doughty German Chancellor Angela Merkel, seems unable to pull itself together either economically or politically. And the US, says a widening corps of US and Asian pundits, has slipped into decline.
The pundits have dubbed them the “declinists.” An early declinist was Paul Kennedy, an historian at Yale University, who published the widely read The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in 1987. In it, he argued that the US was stretched thin by military commitments and spending, a contention echoed today.
In Asia, Tim Huxley, who is in charge of the Singapore office of London’s International Institute of Strategic Studies, wrote recently that it is “clear to me — as it is to many others in the region — that, like it or not, the US’ role in the Asia-Pacific region [not to mention globally] is in long-term relative decline.” In terms of the political, economic, diplomatic, military and social elements of national power, the evidence of US decline is abundant. However, at the same time, the reservoir of fundamental US strengths is not to be denied.
Take politics: On the down side, poll after poll show that a large majority of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction of the nation. A compilation by the Internet site RealClearPolitics reports that only 30 percent of Americans think the country is headed in the right direction, while 61 percent say it is on the wrong track.
In terms of leadership, no politician has the stature of former US presidents Franklin Delano Roosevelt or Harry Truman for the Democrats, or Dwight Eisenhower or Ronald Reagan for the Republicans. More polls show that US voters so far have been turned off by this year’s lackluster, negative presidential election campaign.
The gridlock in the US Congress, where the Democratic-controlled US Senate is led by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and the Republican-controlled House of Representatives by US House Speaker John Boehner, has caused a large majority of Americans to hold the national legislature in contempt.
Former US secretary of state Colin Powell, writing in the New York Times, seemed to express the voters’ lament: “I wish today’s political leaders, especially in Washington, would show the courage and willingness to fight for what they believe in, but possess an understanding of the need to compromise to solve the nation’s problems.”
On the up side, the US has been blessed with two extraordinary documents that have withstood the test of time and still guide the nation — the Declaration of Independence, whose birthday was celebrated last week, and the constitution. They express the ideals and essential optimism of Americans, even if they do not always live up to them.
The freedoms of the mind in the First Amendment — speech, religion, the press and peaceable assembly — hold the allegiance of all but a handful of disgruntled citizens. The constitution’s checks and balances, the presidential and many gubernatorial term limits and the insistence that the police and armed forces remain under civilian control protect Americans from homegrown dictators.
US high schools might be troubled, but US universities, from community colleges to Harvard, are among the world’s best and produce an educated public. Labor productivity is among the highest in the world. So is agricultural efficiency, when one farmer can till a thousand acres.
The US has been perceived to be in decline before. In 1979, shortly after the US defeat in the Vietnam War, when Japan was seen as poised to overtake the US economically and then-US president Jimmy Carter went on TV to bemoan the “malaise” into which the nation seemed to have fallen, the US seemed mortally wounded.
Turns out that pronouncement was premature. The resilient US bounced back. Chances are good that the US will do so again.
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath