I often share photographs of beautiful scenery from Taiwan to encourage people to visit. However, when people go on a trip they expect to return home safely and now that the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) is preparing to install fuel rods and start test operations, it presents a clear and present danger to tourism on the northeast coast.
A well-known Taiwanese bicycle manufacturer used to run a bike rental shop in the coastal town of Fulong (福隆), but the shop closed down several years ago because high humidity and the sea wind made the bicycles’ metal parts vulnerable to rust. As the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant has been under construction on and off for 20 years, how can one be sure that its metal parts are not also rusty?
Once construction is completed, hopefully the power plant will operate without leaking radiation. However, what would happen if a fire were to break out and emit black smoke while the annual Ho-Hai-Yan Gongliao Rock Festival was being held on Fulong Beach? Probably most of the people at the festival would not know the difference between an ordinary fire alarm and one used for a nuclear accident. People could be trampled to death as panicking tourists rushed to leave.
What if a nuclear accident really happened at Fulong? Judging by what happened at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan and the scenes described in the book Voices from Chernobyl, the outcome could be ghastly.
If everyone within a 20km radius had to be evacuated, that would cover the whole of the northeast coast, including Rueifang (瑞芳), Pingsi (平溪), Shuangsi (雙溪) and Gongliao in New Taipei City and Toucheng (頭城) in Yilan County. It would involve moving tens of thousands of residents, plus large numbers of tourists.
Popular tourist spots in the area include Fulong beach, Shueinandong (水湳洞), Jinguashih (金瓜石), Jioufen (九份), Shenao (深澳) fishing port, the waterfall at Shihfen (十分), Bitoujiao (鼻頭角), Honeymoon Bay (蜜月灣), Dasi (大溪) and Waiao (外澳) beach. All these scenic spots would become forbidden zones.
A lot of military and engineering personnel would have to be brought in to remove radioactive dust from people’s bodies and clothing and clean up radioactive materials emitted by the power plant and the machinery and equipment used for the task could not be used again.
Over the years, people affected by radioactive pollution could give birth to deformed children or suffer from depression. The cost of dealing with these problems would be borne by the already financially stressed National Health Insurance program.
Although the Disaster Prevention and Protection Act (災害防救法) and the Public Assistance Act (社會救助法) do not refer specifically to nuclear accidents, their legislative intent would allow them to be interpreted as doing so. According to these laws, city and county social welfare departments would have to assign social workers to help evacuees settle in other areas and distribute relief supplies. The problem is that Taiwan is already short of social workers, and they are often overworked. It would be terrible if social workers were to die from exhaustion, as has happened before.
If evacuees cannot get used to their new lifestyles or accept that their hometowns have been ruined, it is likely that some of them would go back and secretly plant crops. If they sold the produce, it would spread radioactivity around and lead to a food safety crisis. Some evacuees might suffer from discrimination and even attempt suicide. Then firefighters, doctors, nurses, social workers and counselors would all get tied up dealing with the problem.
If the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant really does go into operation, I will no longer be able to recommend the northeast coast as a tour destination.
In 1978, Austria decided that it did not want nuclear power plants. One nuclear power plant was built, but it never operated and was later turned into a museum. The entrance fee visitors pay helps cover the loss suffered by the power companies that built the plant. Only if Taiwan does likewise will people be able to feel really safe when visiting the northeast coast.
Chang Tzu-yang is a writer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing