On May 15, the Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics announced the economy had grown 0.39 percent in the first quarter of this year.
At the same time, it reduced its growth forecast for the year from 3.38 percent to 3.03 percent. In the middle of last month, several economic forecasters lowered their forecasts for the nation’s growth this year.
Almost every economic forecast institution around the world is pessimistic about economic prospects this year. Europe’s economy is in a quagmire. The US economy is weak. Emerging economies are not as vigorous as they were. China faces economic adjustments and slower growth. Brazil’s economy has slowed down and India’s economy remains stuck in a bottleneck. Russia is suffering an increasing impact from the European recession and is no longer thriving.
The first half of this year has seen slack economic performance around the world and quite a lot of countries are setting in motion a second wave of stimulus measures following those implemented in response to the 2008 global financial crisis.
In the first half of this year, Taiwan’s economy has been in a state of near stagnation.
Export growth was negative from January through May, and dropped 6.1 percent in May compared to the same month last year, but its export surplus was up by 83.9 percent.
Analysis reveals that last year’s trade deficit resulted from a big increase of 33.3 percent in imports of capital equipment, while this year’s trade surplus comes from a 10.5 percent drop in imports, which is greater than the 6.3 percent fall in exports.
Of these, imports of capital equipment fell sharply, by 20.5 percent, indicating that businesses have been investing less, which means that production is set to fall still further over time.
Further observation reveals that the situation has remained basically the same since November last year; the drive behind exports has been getting weaker and the economy has almost sputtered to a stop.
The Council for Economic Planning and Development’s overall monitoring indicator has flashed a blue light, indicating a recession, for seven months in a row.
The annual rate of increase in the central bank’s M1B money supply fell to between 3.8 percent and 2.7 percent, well below earlier levels of between 8 percent and 9 percent. At the same time, financial institution lending fell markedly. These are all warning signals of an economic slow-down.
Unfortunately a presidential election was held while this was going on, so officials are only now seeing the problem.
The Cabinet’s declared policy is that it will continue with its seven major short-term response strategies: stabilizing finance, holding down prices, increasing employment, promoting investment, helping industries, pepping up consumption and boosting exports, and it is asking ministries to draw up medium-to-long-term plans to speed up the reshaping of the economy. The government’s overall strategy for responding to changes in the international economic climate is centered on institutional or structural adjustments and legal deregulation.
Among the Cabinet’s list of policies, those promoting investment and boosting exports have clearly been ineffective. Increasing employment and pepping up consumption are also easier said than done in a poor economic climate.
As for stabilizing finance, the stock market has been dancing to the tune of the European debt crisis, so instability prevails despite all efforts to stabilize the market. Interest rates remain low and banks are increasingly reluctant to provide loans for industry and commerce, but the government has not come up with any tangible measures to encourage lending.
Efforts to hold down prices despite fuel and electricity price hikes have generated expectations that are reflected in the price of basic consumer goods to begin with.
However, given the poor economic climate, this effect has been canceled out by changes in other commodities and in salaries. Thus the consumer price index fails to show the true situation, and there is a big gap between the official figures and what the public perceives.
As to the medium-to-long-term plans that the Cabinet wants ministries to draw up, little result has been seen so far, and the government has not come up with a policy direction for the nation to follow if the recession continues through the second half of the year.
Government officials’ perception of the nation’s economic climate is generally confined to the figures, while overlooking the real situation. Consequently, their policies are often sluggish and headline several steps behind real world developments.
The world is forever changing, so our government team had better get on the ball and come up with some effective plans for the economy.
Norman Yin is a professor of financial studies at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath