Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has made a rare political intervention to call on British Minister of Home Affairs Theresa May to stop the extradition of British student Richard O’Dwyer to the US for alleged copyright offenses.
Launching an online campaign, Wales said O’Dwyer, 24, was the “human face” of a global battle over the interests of the film and TV industries and the wider public, which came to a head in the global outcry against proposed US legislation laws the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT Intellectual Property Act (PIPA), which, if passed by the US Congress, would crack down on copyright infringement.
O’Dwyer, a multimedia student at Sheffield Hallam University in northern England, faces up to 10 years in a US prison for founding TVShack.net, a crowdsourced site linking to places to watch full TV shows and movies online.
“When I met Richard, he struck me as a clean-cut, geeky kid. Still a university student, he is precisely the kind of person we can imagine launching the next big thing on the Internet,” Wales said in a comment article for the Guardian.
“Given the thin case against him, it is an outrage that he is being extradited to the US to face felony charges for something that he is not being prosecuted for here. No US citizen has ever been brought to the UK for alleged criminal activity that took place on US soil,” Wales said.
“From the beginning of the Internet, we have seen a struggle between the interests of the ‘content industry’ and the interests of the general public. Due to heavy lobbying and much money lavished on politicians, until very recently the content industry has won every battle,” he added.
“We, the users of the Internet, handed them their first major defeat earlier this year with the epic SOPA/PIPA protests, which culminated in a widespread Internet blackout and 10 million people contacting the US Congress to voice their opposition. Together, we won the battle against SOPA and PIPA. Together, we can win this one, too,” Wales said.
Wales was at the forefront of the campaign against the SOPA and PIPA bills aimed at enforcing online copyright more vigorously, which many warned would threaten sites at the core of the Internet: Google, Wikipedia and others. With other senior editors, Wales set aside for the first time Wikipedia’s vaunted principle of neutrality, blacking out the online encyclopedia for a day as a warning of the consequences of too-strict copyright enforcement.
On Saturday, he launched a petition on change.org, an international campaigning Web site which garnered 2.2 million signatures for a campaign to prosecute the killer of Trayvon Martin in the US.
Wales’ petition called on May to stop O’Dwyer’s extradition. Under UK law, May must grant permission for extraditions to proceed, so she is able to stop extraditions without recourse to the courts.
O’Dwyer’s cause has already attracted cross-party support in the UK from prominent MPs, including Liberal Democrats President Tim Farron, the chair of the home affairs select committee, Keith Vaz, and liberal Conservatives such as David Davis and Dominic Raab.
Other US extraditions, such as those of alleged computer hacker Gary McKinnon and the NatWest Three, have led to calls for reform of the US/UK extradition treaty.
O’Dwyer was arrested by City of London police, accompanied by US customs officials, in November 2010. Six months later, he was told the UK investigation into him would not be pursued, but that he faced extradition to the US.
He faces two charges of copyright infringement and conspiracy to commit copyright infringement, each carrying a maximum of five years in prison. Under UK law, the comparable offenses carry a maximum sentence of six months.
O’Dwyer told the Guardian of his efforts to ignore his potential fate in order to try to complete his degree.
“It does get in the way, it distracts you ... if you thought about extradition all day, you’d never get any work done,” he said. “I think about it sometimes during the day, but I try to think about things that are more important. Otherwise you’d fail university, just sit in your room all day moaning. They’d be winning if I let it do that.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath