All these words are Greek — crisis, chaos and apocalypse. Or, if the world was more clever, this could still end in catharsis and renewal.
Market furies tear the heart out of Europe, first Greece, then Spain, Italy and France, and finally the world — so even beleaguered pro-Europeans give the euro’s survival no more than a 50:50 chance.
If all that is left is a tight little German and northern league, why would the EU stay together after that?
The guttering flame of the European idea is hard to keep alight in this hurricane, but it is not impossible. Look how decisively the French and Greek electorates reject the austerity economics that is killing growth in most of the EU.
The tide of opinion is turning when even Standard & Poor’s at last admits: “Austerity alone risks becoming self-defeating.”
The policy is tested to destruction. A patched-together coalition between old parties that brought Greece to its knees through corruption and cronyism only won because its pledge to get a better deal was marginally more convincing to a despairing electorate, short of food, medicine and fuel.
However, anti-austerity was the only message. Either default on debt or repay only once solid growth makes it feasible — more austerity leads back down the death spiral vortex.
If the new Greek government gets no genuine relaxation of impossible bailout terms, more cuts may propel such protests that the radical SYRIZA will find itself in power shortly. How comfortable to be opposing, just a hair’s breadth from power. It was not sour grapes (courtesy of Aesop, another Greek) for SYRIZA leaders to claim this is where they prefer to be for now.
Meanwhile in Britain, gleeful anti-Europeans gloat: “I told you so,” with smirks on the faces of Norman Lamont, Nigel Farage and the rest.
British Prime Minister David Cameron on Monday yet again wagged his finger emptily at Germany, telling it to intervene, a bizarre stance from one who shares its austerity policy. In all the years of behaving badly to its neighbors, Britain has never been so ignored or so irrelevant to the key decisions taken by its vital trading partners.
Despite sad reminders of former British prime minister Gordon Brown’s worst traits at last week’s Leveson hearings, compare and contrast Cameron’s vacuity with Brown’s finest hour — when no other leader stepped up, Brown galvanized the world to take fast action with a market-stunning £1 trillion (US$1.57 trillion) rescue at the G20 in 2009. Cameron could not galvanize a flea circus.
Instead, his party wallows in a European crisis that will blow back at Britain. True, the blizzard will conveniently white out British Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s egregious economic errors, the zero growth and double-dip. Roll on a referendum, urge the Europhobes, but in or out of what?
Their fantasy is that Britain can slip away to the European economic area on pick ‘n’ mix terms, undercutting EU currencies and irksome trade rules — why would Europe not wreak revenge for Britain’s obnoxious behavior all these years?
At the G20 meeting on Monday, no leader emerged to take the initiative, with US President Barack Obama being deep in a re-election campaign and each country protecting its interests.
Germany could save Greece, but not Spain and Italy. Germany could let the European Central Bank act as a firewall. It could allow inflation to ease the path and embrace growth before debt. However, faced by a choice between breaking the euro and abandoning German orthodoxy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her party would rather let most of Europe go — she has failed to warn her people of the enormous costs of that.
Neither Obama nor Cameron could be seen to pay to save Europe — nor China, nor anyone else — and yet they all know the far greater cost of global collapse.
This is a return to the 1930s, Keynesians say — look where that leads politically. Or is this a dark echo of World War I?
Civilized countries thought protectionism and trade wars could never lead to bloodshed. Yet the world is no saner now than then. Countries pulling up drawbridges, undercutting and cheating each other in times of declining living standards, can still lead to European bloodletting.
Look at the venom — the sneering at Greeks, Italians and Spaniards, lazy southern layabouts. Blaming ineffective governments nastily morphs into blaming whole nations of inferior people. Germans are again represented as spike-helmeted automatons, bidding for a fiscal and political union that would reduce proud nations to town councils under Berlin’s thumb.
Germany v Greece on the Euro 2012 soccer field may be a comic coincidence this week, but nobody should dismiss the seriousness of the EU’s “never again” founding purpose.
Europe’s impasse needs new purpose, after the old economic certainties helped cause this cataclysm.
Even if the EU scrapes through, that will not be enough. What then?
French President Francois Hollande and British Labour Party leader Ed Miliband are calling a summit of Social Democrats this autumn to challenge dogma, and forge a growth and jobs program for construction and investment. Keynesian parties need to draw Europe-wide strength and credibility by working together. Hollande proposes a £120 billion redirection of EU funds to an emergency growth program — he should throw in the Common Agricultural Policy, too.
Abolishing tax havens, coordinating fair tax instead of destructive competition, ending secrecy of wealth and property ownership, cutting defense overspending by France, Britain and Greece — politically hard decisions are easier if Social Democrats can inspire people with the value of standing together, not falling apart.
The G20 may prove that there is no averting imminent calamity, but the right-wing austerity advocates who caused it will have no solutions for its repair. Europe is phenomenally rich, yet it has hardly tapped its own wealth. These governments are still in denial over the real depth of the emergency.
Germany imposed a solidarity tax to pay for reunification, taxing incomes, wealth and property. Britain has barely touched the abundance of its vast, undertaxed wealth. The British government can never rally the nation to unite in a crisis after hitting the weak hardest, with wealthy lifestyles remaining unchanged. The coalition may well fall apart sooner than expected. Labour needs to stand more ready than has yet been the case, with a radical alternative — easier to do as part of a Europe-wide appeal.
In wartime, bonds are issued to finance a national emergency by encouraging (or, from the rich, coercing) investment in a time of crisis. What Europe needs to escape the slump is a war footing — but this time without the war.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath