During his first China visit recently, Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr received an earful from the host nation over the country’s enhanced strategic ties with the US. With US President Barack Obama’s increased focus on the Asia-Pacific region in the US’ foreign and strategic priorities, Australia has become even more important from a US perspective. As part of this new priority, the US intends to base facilities in the country’s north and west for the deployment of US troops and other military assets.
There are also reports that Australia’s Cocos Island in the Indian Ocean might be developed into a base for US surveillance and other activities. There is no doubt that all these developments are designed with a perceived Chinese threat in mind, even though this is formally denied.
China is obviously not happy, believing that Australia is becoming part of a US strategy to contain the communist giant, and Carr was told in no uncertain terms that China was not impressed with what it considers a throwback to the Cold War era.
Australia’s foreign minister had to do some explaining, not only to Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪), but also to Lieutenant General Wei Fenghe (魏鳳和), deputy chief of general staff of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, as well as to Wang Jiarui (王家瑞), international liaison director of the Chinese Communist Party. This was a way of conveying the intensity of China’s concern at government, military and the party levels.
In Carr’s words: “The most objective way of saying it is, my three Chinese partners today invited me to talk about enhanced Australian defense cooperation with the United States. I think their view can be expressed that the time for Cold War alliances have long since past.”
Putting forth Canberra’s viewpoint, Carr said: “An American presence in the Asia-Pacific region has helped underpin stability there and created a climate in which the peaceful economic development — including that of China — has been able to occur.”
Obviously, Carr’s explanation did not cut much ice with the Chinese. Australia will now be viewed with even greater suspicion as part of a giant containment ring that includes Japan.
Even though China is now Australia’s largest trading partner, their relationship leaves much to be desired. Ironically, the relationship started to deteriorate sharply under Mandarin-speaking former Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd, who described himself as “a brutal realist on China.”
He offended the Chinese leadership by publicly advising them to hold dialogue with the Dalai Lama. And it was under him that Australia’s 2009 White Paper on defense highlighted China as an increasing threat to regional stability, recommending a significant increase in Australia’s defense profile, including a doubling of its submarine fleet.
The tensions increased when Australia granted a visa to exiled World Uyghur Congress president Rebiya Kadeer to visit Australia in 2009.
On top of it all, China was unhappy because its concerted efforts to invest in Australian resource companies were denied, in some cases, on the grounds of national interest. The same argument has prevailed more recently against the Chinese communications giant, Huawei Technologies Co, which is seeking to build Australia’s National Broadband Network.
In its worldwide search to secure resource materials for its economic development, Australia is for China a huge and tempting quarry, not to speak of its vast agricultural lands. China is hungry to get a hold on it for two reasons.
First, of course, is the need for uninterrupted access to needed raw materials. Australia is a stable political and social entity that makes it an attractive option.
Second, with control of Australian resources China would also be able to keep a lid on price rises of these materials, such as iron ore and coal.
The analogy of Japan’s World War II mission to impose a Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere on its neighbors comes into mind. Though the two situations are different, the goal is identical: to have access to natural resources and materials to forge an economically and politically powerful nation. And Australia has plenty of the key resources that China so badly needs.
This is where economic and strategic factors converge for China, creating fears in Australia and other regional countries about its intentions.
It looks as if China is actually seeking to create its own version of the Japanese East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere, a kind of new Middle Kingdom. And the regional countries are not looking forward to it.
It is not just Australia that is seeking insurance against a Chinese threat through enhanced defense ties with the US; other countries are doing it too.
The Philippines, for instance, is in a tense military standoff with China over the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島), with China claiming the whole of South China Sea as its territory. Even though some of the South China Sea Islands are closer to neighboring Southeast Asian countries, as Scarborough Shoal is to the Philippines, China claims everything by virtue of its sovereign claim over the sea, and it is not prepared to countenance negotiations or mediation.
With its claim over the South China Sea, Beijing might one day also interfere with or impede the freedom of navigation through one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.
As Peter Hartcher, international editor of the Sydney Morning Herald, wrote in a recent column: “[China’s] willfulness troubles other countries. Australia is only one of many Asia-Pacific states that looks to the US for reassurance in the face of doubts about China’s intentions.”
“If it angers China, it is within its power to ease those doubts,” he added.
However, do not count on it. China seems intent on going its own way.
Sushil Seth is a commentator based in Australia.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath