It is kind of ironic to see President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) popularity ratings plummet so quickly in the four months between his re-election and his second term inauguration. From garnering a majority of the vote in the Jan. 14 presidential election he has now hit a rating of less than 20 percent in recent polls. Ma has gone from hero to zero in no time at all.
It seems that the 51.6 percent of the electorate who voted him back into power are just now waking up to the fact that he is just another manipulative politician without their interests at heart. Ma pays back his political benefactors in Beijing and Washington, as well as the heads of some of the Cabinet’s ministries, but he does not seem to care about the well-being of those who really put him in power — the heads of Taiwan’s small-to-medium sized enterprises and the public at large.
With Ma’s fuel and energy price increases and the proposed capital gains tax on securities trading, Ma is hitting his real supporters where it counts, in the wallet — and they are finally getting to see what kind of a president he truly is.
However, it is too late. It is too late for his erstwhile supporters to say he is not looking out for their interests. It is too late to try to block his ill-timed economic proposals in the legislature. It does no good to tell a pollster now that they do not think he is doing a good job, because they voted him in and like it or not, we must live with him for the next four years.
Ma made it abundantly clear in his first term what to expect from him in a second. He trod all over the rights of farmers, had administration members engage in closed-door meetings with Beijing officials and failed to deliver on his promises of economic growth — even when Taiwan was rebounding after the 2008 recession. He made decisions with no regard for public opinion and shied away from contact with the outside world, earning him the moniker the “Facebook President.” He proved himself unable to listen to countervailing opinions and failed to lay any groundwork to make good on some of his better policies, the result of one, for example, has meant a lack of tour bus drivers for the hordes of Chinese tour groups visiting the nation.
His incompetence in handling the Typhoon Morakot disaster shocked many and the zeal with which he pursues the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) vendetta against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and the Democratic Progressive Party has left many people with a negative impression. Ma, who prides himself on his sense of unerring justice, seems to have eroded the very system that could have kept justice alive by making sure that prosecutors go after political enemies, while ignoring the wrongs of political allies.
In all the fields that count, Ma has demonstrated unimaginable ineptitude — in military relations, in democracy building, in economics, in negotiations, in simple people skills.
However, the 51.6 percent who re-elected him to serve a second term, decided to give him another chance perhaps because his incompetence had not hurt them yet. Sad as it is to say though, these voters have no right to express dissatisfaction now, for he is the president they asked for.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath