President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) acted with lightning speed in issuing several “reform measures” following his re-election — fuel and electricity prices were adjusted upward and a capital gains tax on securities transactions is back on the cards. Rapidly increasing consumer prices and a storm of public protests have accompanied Ma’s return to power, and his approval rate has dropped to record lows.
If we ignore for a moment how just and legitimate these decisions are, and instead look at the timing and implementation of Ma’s reforms, it is obvious that he has acted too hastily and that in doing so, he has run counter to the wisdom of the expression: “Undue haste breaks the bowl.”
There is another saying: “A new broom sweeps clean.” This normally implies that someone taking up a new job, a new official trying to establish their authority, or someone following a certain ideal works hard at first to implement new policies and to initiate reform. To a certain extent, commitment to innovation is of course a good thing. The problem is that what the ruler thinks is the right thing is not necessarily in step with what the public wants, or in the public interest.
If the government does not first gain an in-depth understanding of public opinion to be able to plan a reasonable and forceful reform process and instead chooses sudden and unexpected implementation, failure is almost certain.
Let’s look at fuel and electricity prices. In addition to the issue of whether the increases are appropriate, the government should also consider how and when the increases should be implemented and how to minimize the impact on the public if it wants to avoid a backlash that could affect policy implementation. The same reasoning also applies to the securities transaction tax.
If the government only cares about the superficial issue of fair taxation and ignores the complexities and sensitivities of the stock market culture as well as its complicated connection with the grassroots economy and instead decides to rashly roll out the new tax, what will happen is precisely what we see today: A tense standoff between the public and government officials, between the government and the legislature.
Ma has made the mistake of thinking that just because he is no longer under any electoral pressure, he can engage in far-reaching and drastic reforms. He has therefore been in a hurry to “set” several “fires,” but never expected that he could go too far and instead burn himself and lose the public’s trust.
The ancient Chinese philosopher Laozi (老子) says: “Governing a great state is like cooking small fish.”
This means that when running a country, the ruler should be as careful and patient as when frying small fish and not be too eager or use too much force lest they mess things up. During China’s Song Dynasty, statesman Wang Anshi (王安石) introduced new laws and many new measures that seemed both reasonable and beneficial to the state, yet it all ended in failure. There were many reasons for this, but the crucial mistakes were certainly that he rushed ahead and failed to gain an understanding of public sentiment, which created widespread resistance.
Today, fuel and electricity prices and the securities transaction tax may seem like minor issues, but the fact is that they affect people’s living conditions and therefore have a big impact on society at large. These are not issues that can be carelessly dealt with or rashly pushed through.
Hsu Yu-fang is associate professor and chairman of sinophone literatures at National Dong Hua University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath