Austerity is wrong-headed
It is rather unfortunate that your recent editorial unthinkingly endorses the current stampede toward austerity measures as the panacea to economic problems (“Election results threaten the euro,” May 9, page 8). In fact, the essential ingredient of the European bailouts is to protect Goldman Sachs and Franco-German private lenders from the moral hazard of lending too much to the wrong people.
No one but a simpleton believes that the credit extended by the European Central Bank is anything but computer manipulation that does not represent new real money. However, it does transfer liability to sovereign countries whose populations must struggle to meet unreasonable demands. The global economic Ponzi scheme continues unabated.
No wonder voters are rightly rejecting these phony nostrums. Austerity will reduce populations to poverty and cause very real suffering, while the rich will take advantage of deflated prices to sweep up public and private assets in these countries at fire sale prices. Only the “1 percent” will benefit.
As for solving the real problem of deficits, the austerity measures will push these economies further toward the brink with little chance of recovery for a very long time.
John Hanna
Taoyuan
Seeing red over traffic lights
I would like to add my two cents to the recent discussion on Taiwan’s dangerous traffic.
To me, about the worst things are those traffic lights that show you how many seconds you have left to cross an intersection.
This system is pure madness and facilitates carnage.
What does a driver who approaches an intersection do when he sees that the light will turn red in 5 seconds?
He will speed up, of course. The vehicle will enter the intersection much faster, which arguably is the least desired effect any traffic management system could possibly have.
I sincerely hope that researchers from the National Taiwan University, Academia Sinicia, etc, will find out how many people here are annually crippled, widowed or orphaned due to this stupidity.
Jens Kastner
Taipei
Ma’s nicknames
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has probably earned the most nicknames of any president. These nicknames vividly reflect his personality and/or performance.
When former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was in power, he nominated Ma to run for mayor of Taipei and praised Ma as a “New Taiwanese” with great expectations. Lee later called Ma the “Underwear Runner” — a jogger wearing Ma underwear or an underwear-wearing fugitive running away in a hurry.
Ma has the endearing nickname of “Little Horse Brother” that won him millions of votes in mayoral and presidential elections. Lee and former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) also have the endearing names of “A-hui” and “A-bian,” respectively. The nickname in this form can also mean contempt, depending on the context. In addition, Lee has the nicknames of “Long Chin” and “Father of Democracy.”
In Taiwanese, “jeou” in Ma’s given name can be pronounced as “giu” or “gao.” The latter has a double meaning (“nine” or “dog”). Ma and Bian (from Chen’s given name) can be combined into a Chinese character that means “cheating.”
The Chinese always call Ma “mister” instead of “president.” Many Taiwanese call Ma “Regional Chief” since Ma says Taiwan is “a region of China.” Ma seldom listens to Taiwanese and often does things behind their backs and thus has gained the nickname “Emperor Ma.”
Because of Ma’s incompetent performance, Taiwanese have nicknamed him “Diarrhea Horse.” Ma likes to claim that he is a Hakka, but a Hakka volunteer group has recently given him the new nickname “Boastful Horse” because Ma has broken so many promises. Even vice president-elect Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has a nickname: “Liar.”
These nicknames indicate that Ma’s policies have been off track. His approval rate has plunged to 15 percent. In his second term, Ma should connect with the public before he “connects with the world.”
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Dying for your country
It strikes me that a survey on the attitude of young Taiwanese to military service reflects a growing sentiment among youth worldwide these days (“Youth will not fight for Taiwan: poll,” May 13, page 1).
In the US, where there is no conscription, fewer than 2.5 percent of people feel an inclination to enlist in the military for any reason. Immediately after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington, there was only a minor upsurge in enlistments. Yet interestingly, the sense of personal entitlement did not diminish one bit.
The younger generation still wants to “have their cake and eat it too.”
There does not seem to be any feeling of duty to the nation any more. Have we, as the older generation, neglected our duties in teaching our children that “freedom is not free?” Have we grown weary of “keeping one eye open?” Or, if one expands the parameters of the survey, would we find that the younger generation would much prefer a peaceful coexistence or capitulation just to avoid conflict?
I don’t think that a return to ultranationalism is the answer, but I don’t think giving in to a bully is the answer either.
At some point in time, we all need to ‘give back’ to a nation that has given us so much. Maybe that is what they need to hear — they need to appreciate what they have been given.
Tom Kuleck
Greater Taichung
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China