Predictable tragedy
I was very saddened by Monday’s bus collision and tragedy in the Hsuehshan Tunnel, yet I am not surprised.
As a Canadian who has been living in Taiwan for eight years, I am still frustrated every time I drive my car here. Whether it be on a highway, a main road through the city or even a small lane, people are always driving too fast, too close together, and with little regard for safety. There is no three-second rule to the car in front of you here, there is no need to use your turn signal when turning and there is nothing wrong with a bus driver eating betel nut, smoking cigarettes, watching TV and talking to the person sitting beside him.
There is no need for children to wear seatbelts when they can sit on the driver’s lap or stand out the car’s sunroof.
Until recently, there was no need for passengers in the rear to wear their seatbelts at all.
There is no need to look before you are turning, there is no need to be concerned with anyone around you, and there is no need to use what some people call common sense while driving.
After being cut off by a car in front of me that did not use a turn signal, I asked my Taiwanese passenger why people do not use their turn signals to warn others that they are turning.
The response was startling: “They don’t teach us to. They only teach us how to pass the test.”
I was then told that drivers do not even do a road test with their instructor. They do a couple of loops on a closed track, park a couple of times and then are given the right to drive their cars in some of the most congested traffic I have ever seen.
Until Taiwan addresses these rampant problems, needless and senseless deaths like the ones on Monday are going to continue to happen.
Cousin Steve
Greater Taichung
Police to blame
After reading the paper on Sunday, and seeing two fatal road accidents, I cannot hold my peace anymore. There have been a few letters recently concerning traffic in Taiwan, but I feel none has adequately stated the real source of the problem: the police. Enforcement is the main issue. I have argued about this with many who say education needs to be improved and while I will not argue with that, to fix this problem Taiwan needs to seriously step up enforcement.
The first issue is: Where is the will? Rather than cloud the water and argument with pretense, let us get right to it. Why aren’t laws enforced and people aggressively ticketed by the police?
In Taichung, the mayor seems to have turned his attention to drunken driving. While that is a noble cause, what about the daily traffic violations that have become so flagrant, so aggressive and so dangerous that I do not know how people are not demanding that the local and national authorities take action?
I believe that the police are either not up to the task or have no interest in doing their job. I propose three quick fixes which have been effective in other countries with longer and safer driving traditions than Taiwan.
First, equip all public buses with cameras. These camera feeds can be monitored. Any recorded violations must be heavily ticketed. Include among crimes to be punished parking in a driving lane. The constant obstruction of busy roads by motorists who seem to park their car wherever they wish is one of the greatest dangers bicyclists and motorcyclists face.
Second, allow all citizens the right to use the recorded footage from their cars to make complaints to police about traffic offenses. Video that leads to a ticketed offense should earn the reporting citizen a small reward. Even a reward as small as NT$200 to NT$300 would be enough to motivate drivers to take the effort to report dangerous drivers. Imagine how much professional drivers (taxi drivers, truckers, etc) could supplement their income. If the police are not going to chase people down, then let civic-minded citizens do the work for them.
Finally, the highways must be more heavily monitored. Using more cameras or patrol cars will not be enough. A serious system should be installed like that found in the UK, which records license plates and then measures the time between checkpoints to calculate your average speed. Whether you are speeding in front of the camera does not matter if you have been speeding between cameras. A system like that already in operation in England would clean up this problem. Those with an average speed exceeding the speed limit would automatically be sent fines.
Additionally, long-haul truckers and buses in most EU countries and the US must carry a speed-measuring device. The device logs the vehicle’s speed at all times. These devices create cards that must be submitted to local traffic authorities along with a log of all the driver’s hours and how many kilometers they have traveled. The numerous and disastrous number of bus accidents on Taiwan’s highways cannot be swept under the rug.
The most common response I hear when suggesting such measures is: What of the enormous cost of building such a system? This is a very shortsighted concern. While the initial costs might seem great, in the long term, these will be money-making ventures. Imposing fines on dangerous lawbreakers is a win-win situation for public safety and the public coffers, which can use the money from the fines to improve roads and infrastructure.
Lastly, think of the human cost of not implementing a system to better regulate our traffic. The number of drivers is not decreasing, and while there are many other steps needed to improve road safety, I feel these steps are both practical and effective.
Bad driving is at its heart selfish behavior. Seeing that penalties and punishments are so rarely meted out, Taiwan has developed a culture that regularly violates traffic rules and even more dangerous is the culture that is completely apathetic to the issue and readily turns a blind eye to public safety. It is going to take a brave push to bring about change in a land where poor driving is the norm.
Aaron Andrews
Greater Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing