From time to time the public catches a glimpse of the arduous conditions endured by those who work in healthcare. For example, the nation’s shortage of nurses is now so severe that some hospitals have been forced to cut beds. Internal medicine, surgery, gynecology, pediatrics and emergency treatment are departments in which staff work long hours and often come under intense pressure. As a result, fewer people are now willing to take up these specialties and replace those who retire or resign.
The great majority of hospitals outside major urban areas no longer provide gynecological and pediatric services. In a report entitled A General Health Check for the National Health Insurance Program (健保總體檢), Control Yuan member Huang Huang-hsiung (黃煌雄) examined the topic of key community hospitals in rural and urban townships. In the words of the report: “The government must do all it can to safeguard these hospitals through its formulation of policy. At present there are 50 to 60 such important community hospitals that not only play the role of healthcare guardians, but also take on other social functions in rural and urban townships.”
However, these township hospitals are now suffering from the same problems as those in more out-of-the-way places. Most have for a long time faced a severe shortage of gynecological and pediatric doctors and nurses, while age is taking its toll on those who are still working. It is getting harder to maintain properly functioning gynecological and pediatric healthcare services and this is an issue that the government and general public should take very seriously.
Society expects healthcare workers to have high moral standards. People think that it is the sacred mission of doctors and nurses to work all year round with no vacation, serving the public at all hours of the day and night.
Many healthcare workers themselves have the same ingrained idea. Long working hours are the normal state of affairs for doctors and nurses, and most people think that such selfless service is only to be expected. It is the selfless dedication of healthcare workers that makes it possible for Taiwan’s National Health Insurance program to provide world-class healthcare on a very tight budget.
The convenience with which Taiwanese can seek medical care is unparalleled, as is their unrestrained use of the available services.
Eventually, however, we must face reality and recognize that healthcare is a labor-intensive, technology-intensive and capital-intensive service. Inadequate capital investment and unreasonable overtime are sure to have a negative effect on the quality of service provided. Such conditions also discourage young people from joining the medical profession. If things continue like this, we could face a crisis in which this essential service simply runs out of steam.
This is why healthcare workers have been protesting so much recently. The issue has attracted public attention and the Control Yuan has even proposed corrective measures that it wants to see implemented by government departments in charge of healthcare. These are welcome developments.
What people find most puzzling is the attitude taken by groups representing hospitals, who should be most aware of the heavy workload and difficulties faced by healthcare personnel. People are asking why hospitals oppose government proposals that they should deploy more healthcare personnel and ensure that they work reasonable hours in accordance with the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法). Their attitude seems to confirm accusations that hospitals are little better than sweatshops.
The arduous working conditions that healthcare workers’ groups have been protesting about are all matters of fact. What hospital-related groups are opposed to is the government’s irresponsible reaction to the protests, when officials call for more healthcare staff and for reasonable working hours, without telling the public that, faced with such unreasonable conditions, the only way to prevent hospital services from grinding to a halt is to invest more resources in them.
As the two sides agree about the need to provide healthcare personnel with a reasonable working environment, it would be wrong for the public to get the idea that the issue is essentially a labor dispute between sweatshop hospitals on the one side and healthcare workers on the other. If people view the issue that way, it could just fizzle out without any proper resolution, in which case a good opportunity for reform will have been missed.
The government and public should take a rational approach to this unavoidable problem. Given the natural human tendency to take “all you can eat,” should we not try to relieve some of the burden on medical services by cutting back on some non-essential healthcare services and restricting some people’s habit of visiting clinics at the drop of a hat?
At the same time, the government should also invest reasonable resources where they are needed to bring doctors’ and nurses’ work hours back within a range that people can be reasonably expected to tolerate. If we could do that, then those who are willing to work in the healthcare sector will remain at their posts, and the public can rest assured that they will continue to receive a high standard of medical care.
Hsieh Wen-hui is honorary chair of the ROC Community Hospital Association.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath