Late last month, the Supreme Court finalized the verdict for former independent legislator Lo Fu-chu (羅福助), sentencing him to four years in prison for stock manipulation, forgery and money laundering under the Securities and Exchange Act (證券交易法) and the Business Accounting Act (商業會計法).
Lo did not report to the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office to begin serving his term on Tuesday, and he has yet to show up, providing yet another example of an offender escaping judicial punishment. Prosecutors claim that this is a result of the law’s imperfections, but is that really true?
Going through the length of Taiwan’s criminal trial process with an initial trial and two appeals levels usually takes a very long time, from four to more than 10 years. Since a defendant cannot be detained indefinitely, they are unlikely to be in custody when the verdict is finalized, which creates the problem of how to ensure that verdicts are carried out.
Because a case is closed when judgement has been finalized, the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法) only deals with the prevention of escape prior to the final judgement. Based on the principle of legal restraint, prosecutors cannot reason by analogy and apply the preventive measures to defendants after the final judgement has been given. This has created a serious legal loophole that offenders may feel tempted to exploit.
Indeed, this legal shortcoming is a reason why some political and business “celebrities” have managed to abscond judicial punishment, but the governing authorities should not use this as an excuse to escape responsibility. It is not a new problem. There are countless previous examples, including former Pingtung County commissioner Wu Tzer-yuan (伍澤元), business tycoon Wang You-theng (王又曾) and former Control Yuan member Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄).
Prosecutors and police should have learned from experience and come up with a solution to this problem. If they always pass the buck by pointing to the incomplete law instead of reviewing the situation, Lo will not be the last to escape judicial punishment.
Even if the authorities believe that the incomplete system is the cause of the problem, the continued repetition of such cases should force them to take action and propose an amendment to the law to get rid of the loophole. For example, they could change the law to impose compulsory supervision and control of offenders whose sentences have been finalized.
Also, they could look to the Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act (性侵害犯罪防治法), which allows the authorities to monitor and control both probationers and parolees using technical equipment. They could extend this approach to criminal defendants prior to their final judgement. All these are tasks that should be implemented promptly.
Unfortunately, although the governing authority, the Ministry of Justice, is aware of the problem, it has dealt with it passively. It simply blames the incompleteness of the law whenever a case like this occurs. Such behavior will only further damage public trust in law enforcement.
Wu Ching-chin is an associate professor in the Department of Law at Aletheia University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a