ICRT responds to criticism
It was with great dismay and disappointment that we read Chou Long’s letter (Letters, April 14, page 8) and his criticism of International Community Radio Taipei (ICRT). ICRT is committed to serving the public, and we welcome comments and suggestions any time. In regards to Chou Long’s letter, there are numerous errors that need to be addressed.
First, ICRT is not “owned” by any individual or family. ICRT was established in 1979 when the US military pulled out of Taiwan. AmCham [the American Chamber of Commerce] and others in the international community lobbied the US and Taiwanese governments to maintain the operation of Armed Forces Radio Taiwan. In response, the Taipei International Community Cultural Foundation (TICCF) was established as a non-profit foundation to run the station. The TICCF’s board of directors has always included local and foreign business and community leaders who all share a common goal: maintaining English-language broadcasts in Taiwan. None of the board members have ever received any remuneration, nor been involved in the station’s day-to-day operation.
Today, ICRT is completely self-supporting, and does not receive any funding from the government.
Second, ICRT has never attempted to become a Mandarin-language station. ICRT’s mandate is twofold: to serve the international community and act as a bridge to the local community. We fulfill this mandate through local and international news reports, entertaining music from around the world, community interviews and announcements, events and activities promoting cross-cultural understanding, as well as fun and educational programs. ICRT maintains close communications with the international community, including business groups, international schools, diplomatic missions and community organizations.
Finally, Chou’s letter reveals a lack of understanding of ICRT and the global media market.
The radio industry has changed drastically over the past two decades, and any broadcaster that neglects to keep pace will only fail. With fewer advertising dollars, we have had to make some difficult decisions, but we have never lost sight of our mandate.
More recently, ICRT has worked to increase the quality of its news and brought back weekend newscasts. We are always on standby in the event of inclement weather or natural disasters to provide accurate and up-to-date information. This is a critical mission that we have never neglected. Music has always been an important element of ICRT programming, and is not a recent addition.
ICRT has taken steps to improve programming quality to better meet the tastes of our core audience: 20-to-40-year-old professionals, office workers and college students, as well as the international community. Our on-air talent includes people from various English-speaking nations, as well as local Taiwanese. Many of the programming elements that Chou ridicules have been well received by our audience. Taste is very subjective.
Despite growing competition for our audience’s attention, including a proliferation of radio and TV broadcasters and the rise of the Internet, ICRT has maintained its overall market ratings and ranking, demonstrating continued support from the public.
International
Community Radio
Taipei
Filipinos in support of ICRT
My two cents is that Chou Long and Anthony Van Dyck’s views of ICRT are quite different from those of members of Taiwan’s Filipino community. Thanks to the wonderful efforts of Emily David, ICRT has successfully transformed itself into a medium that Filipinos rely on. News from the US is not a top priority for Filipinos listening to the radio — pop songs that lighten the burden of housework or factory labor are essential and ICRT fills that need.
While there are other radio shows targeting the Filipino community in Taiwan, ICRT’s Asia Nation is our most listened-to program. ICRT’s Facebook outreach makes it easy for Flipinos to request their favorite songs and communicate with the DJs. When talking about ICRT and its role in Taiwan, do not forget the role it plays as the station of choice for many proud Filipinos in Taiwan.
Yolly Marie Teope
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath