Some of the world’s most prominent central bankers may have to hope the pen is as mighty as the sword.
With the US Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank (ECB) and other authorities in industrialized countries already stretching the limits of monetary policy, pressure has risen for them not go any further, and even to begin pulling back.
Top officials have had to rely increasingly on speeches — not always successfully — to convey to financial markets how they intend to manage their economies.
“A new policy regime characterized by jawboning is now here,” TD Securities economist Eric Green said. “Policy is more constrained and more accommodation increasingly problematic in scope and complexity.”
As US Treasury yields began to rise late last month on signs of an economic recovery, US Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke gave a speech that focused on the weakness of the labor market. Stocks and bond markets rallied on hopes that this meant he was gearing up for a third round of quantitative easing, or QE3. The following week, the release of minutes from the Fed’s meeting last month painted a much more hawkish picture, with a dwindling number of voting members on the Federal Open Market Committee — just two of 10 — actively considering more stimulus.
The news prompted Vincent Reinhart, a former Fed staffer now at Morgan Stanley, to sharply revise down his forecast for the prospects of QE3 to just one-third from two-thirds.
Then, just a few days later, data showed the pace of job creation halved last month from previous months, reviving some of the bets on more Fed action. However, economists said policymakers would not read too much into one’s month data.
“This transparency thing is completely new to the Fed. They are making it up as they go along, and they’re confusing people,” said Steve Wyatt, a professor of finance at Miami University’s Farmer School of Business.
A string of Fed officials, including Bernanke, will speak at public appearances this week, so investors could be in for another rollercoaster.
It’s not just in the US that the effort to talk down rising interest rates is taking hold.
In the eurozone, the ECB’s injection of more than 1 trillion euros (US$1.31 trillion) in loans to banks seems to be as much additional support the region’s recession-threatened economy can hope for.
However, ECB President Mario Draghi has made it clear he will not be pressured into tightening monetary policy quickly.
While at pains to assuage concerns among a German-led group of ECB policymakers about inflation, Draghi dismissed a Bundesbank push to begin preparing to reverse course.
“Any exit strategy talking for the time being is premature,” he said, adding bluntly: “I think the president of the ECB is the one who has the last word on this.”
Unless the global economy suffers a new shock, such as a sharp slowdown in China, policymakers may have to rely on providing verbal guidance to markets rather than resort to another round of measures, such as bond purchases or loans to banks, to boost liquidity.
Even the governor of a central bank that does look set to ease further, the Bank of Japan, has warned that an overreliance on bond purchases might be interpreted by financial markets as a backdoor government bailout.
Bank for International Settlements general manager Jaime Caruana echoed concerns that governments were being allowed to put off the pain of fixing their balance sheets.
“There is a serious risk of overburdening monetary policy,” he said at a recent Fed conference in Washington.
In the US, the approach of November’s elections could make it harder for the Fed to act even if internal support for easing were to gather momentum. Republican candidates have openly accused Bernanke of risking an increase in inflation and jeopardizing the US dollar.
Chicago Fed president Charles Evans, one of the Fed’s most dovish officials, argues the central bank could squeeze more stimulus from its recent guidance that interest rates are likely to stay low until at least late 2014 if it conveyed to markets that this was more of a firm promise than just a forecast.
Others, like James Bullard of the St Louis Fed, take the exact opposite view.
“The 2014 language in effect names a date far in the future at which macroeconomic conditions are still expected to be exceptionally poor. This is an unwarranted pessimistic signal for the [Fed] to send,” Bullard said.
The other issue is, will the markets believe the Fed’s low rates guidance? And if not, does the central bank risk a loss of credibility?
Wyatt sees this as a big concern.
“They’re going to have a heck of a time with that. You’re seeing pretty strong evidence that the market is pricing in a move sooner, despite what the Fed says,” Wyatt said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing