Republican front-runner Mitt Romney is starting to hone his appeal to female voters, acutely aware as he turns to the general election that he has little choice but to narrow US President Barack Obama’s commanding lead among this critical constituency.
None too soon, say many Republican activists. They expect Romney, as well as his popular wife, Ann, to make an explicit pitch to female voters on the economy and jobs, their top issues.
The eventual nominee “needs to start recognizing the power that women voters have,” said Rae Lynne Chornenky, president of the National Federation of Republican Women.
Romney, a former Massachusetts governor on pace to clinch the nomination in June, if not earlier, acknowledges that the Republican Party faces a historical challenge in closing the advantage Democrats have with women.
Romney has won far more delegates to the Republican nominating convention than his challengers: former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum, US Representative Ron Paul and former House of Representatives speaker Newt Gingrich.
Like Obama, Romney sees pocketbook issues as the key to winning them.
“We have work to do to make sure we take our message to the women of America, so they understand how we’re going to get good jobs and we’re going to have a bright economic future for them and for their kids,” Romney said last week in Middleton, Wisconsin.
By Friday, Obama was making the same argument at the White House, where he hosted a conference on women and the economy. He presented a full review of the administration’s achievements on equal pay and workplace flexibility as new unemployment numbers showed an uptick in job creation.
“When we talk about these issues that primarily impact women, we’ve got to realize they are not just women’s issues. They are family issues, they are economic issues, they are growth issues, they are issues about American competitiveness,” Obama said, using his office to cast himself as a defender of women.
His Democratic allies are putting it more bluntly, saying that Republicans are waging a “war against women.”
Almost daily, US political discourse features some echo of this battle for women’s votes, whether from members of the House and Senate, the Democratic and Republican national committees or the presidential candidates.
Earlier this spring, the president called Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke to reassure her after radio host Rush Limbaugh called her a “slut.”
Fluke had testified to congressional Democrats in support of their national healthcare policy that would compel her school to offer health plans that cover birth control. Republicans widely called Limbaugh’s comments inappropriate.
On Thursday, Obama called for women to be accepted as members to the all-male Augusta National, home of the Masters golf tournament. Romney quickly followed his lead.
However, the Republican’s challenge is stark.
Romney must overcome history, political math and the missteps of a party that picked a fight over one provision of Obama’s healthcare law and ended up on the defensive over access to birth control. Romney also has work to do with female voters after inconsistencies or misstatements on issues such as abortion and the future of Planned Parenthood.
Republicans have faced a “gender gap” since 1980, with women generally favoring Democratic candidates. A recent USA Today/Gallup poll found that gap lifts Obama to a lead across a dozen crucial states.
The poll showed women favor Obama by 18 percentage points, while men split about evenly between the two candidates. Taken together, that means women boost Obama to a 51-42 lead over Romney in those states.
There’s evidence that Romney faces a steeper climb among women than did US Senator John McCain, the Republican president nominee in 2008.
Washington Post/ABC News polls at roughly the same point in the political calendar show McCain was viewed favorably by 47 percent of women at this time in 2008, while Romney currently stands at 30 percent favorable among women.
Romney is convinced that women, like men, will vote chiefly on Obama’s stewardship of the US’ finances, so he tried to stay focused on the economy during this year’s battle over contraception.
However, some of his surrogates led the effort to cast the law’s mandate for birth control coverage as a violation of religious freedom, widely considered a lost argument that left questions about the Republican Party’s commitment to preserving women’s rights.
Romney might have dealt himself trouble with his inconsistent position over the years on abortion and a comment earlier this year that sounded as if he wanted to “get rid of” Planned Parenthood. His campaign later clarified that he was referring to deleting federal funding for the organization, not eliminating it outright.
Then there is the way Romney handles questions about his message to women; conservative Republican women say he has to work do to on that front.
Virtually every time, Romney answers by invoking his wife of 43 years and reports what it is she has told him about what women want.
“She reports to me regularly that the issue women care about most is the economy and getting good jobs for their kids and for themselves,” Romney told the Newspaper Association of America on Wednesday. “They are concerned about gasoline prices, the cost of getting to and from work, taking their kids to school or to practice and so forth after school. That is what women care about in this country and my vision is to get America working again.”
A few days earlier in Middleton, he was asked how he would counter the Democrats’ narrative on contraception.
He prefaced his answer this way: “I wish Ann were here ... to answer that question in particular.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing