George Orwell’s Animal Farm is an allegorical novella and a political satire.
The work describes the owner of a farm who drinks and takes things out on his animals because he is not happy with his life. Not being able to stand it any longer, the animals finally revolt against their master. With freedom from slavery in their sights, these smart pigs start copying their former master, doing everything from lying to leading extravagant lives.
Orwell’s book offers a deep meditation on totalitarianism and human nature.
It would seem that Taiwan has recently become something of a “new Animal Farm” in which chickens are sick, cattle and pigs are poisonous and horses lack conscience (the president’s family name means “horse”).
This situation was brought about by poor governance and has threatened our right to exist. This is what happens when people try to cling to power, and show no concern for morals and political responsibility.
Allegations of covering up health epidemics and ignoring their effects on public health, crippling our safety system, seem to be all too common occurrences in our current age. The way to avoid the degradation of human nature is to respect the rights of all animals, establishing mutual trust and responsibility.
However, the government’s incompetent handling of the plasticizer scare last year, the way it misjudged the severity of the bird flu outbreak and the way it has handled the recent controversy surrounding US beef imports all show how the government lies and covers things up.
The public has, as a result, developed a distrust in politicians and the government. Lies can be aimed at benefiting oneself by consolidating one’s current power. Lying to people spares them the truth. However, when obvious lies are being covered up by the government left, right and center, the public not only becomes anxious, people also lose their sense of security and belonging in the economic and political system.
The focus on guanxi or “relations” in Chinese society often means people are more concerned with making connections and keeping a superficial sense of harmony than pursuing facts. When the government openly defended itself by saying there were no political preconditions attached to the US beef issue, that was a show of being a technocracy that bases its reviews on scientific truth.
However, one could also say that this was the result of cynicism and a belief that the highest form of lying is one in which mistakes are made in the name of justice and sincerity. Cynics believe the best way of dealing with lies is to say they are performed “in the name of truth.”
When important issues come under constant threat, we must be able to see that the decision on whether something is bad for the health of human beings is not a simple biological matter, but rather a multi--faceted issue involving scientific knowledge, political practice and social constructionism.
During the Enlightenment, a lot of satire was devoted to the pursuit of any arbitrary truth. We should take the lessons of that time to remind ourselves that we cannot just sit around and watch how things pan out. We must participate actively to change things.
Bringing down an empire built on lies, and rebuilding trust and ethics are tough tasks that Taiwan’s “new animal farm” will have to take on and they are issues we cannot stray away from.
Lin Yaw-sheng is a professor of psychology at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath