Reading the tea leaves after the pomp, platitudes and posturing during the visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to Washington DC, Iowa and California last week turns up little evidence that the mutual suspicion between the US and China has eased.
Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai (崔天凱) called it a “trust deficit.” Elizabeth Economy, director for Asia Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, agreed: “Trust is only built over time. It requires clarity of intention, predictability of action and a willingness to give before taking.”
“And all that,” she argued, “is sorely lacking between Washington and China.”
The Chinese, for instance, demand that they be treated as equals to Americans — except when they see it to their advantage to play down their progress.
Xi’s tour of the US was a close mirror image of US Vice President Joseph Biden’s journey to China in August last year. Both had intensive rounds of military reviews, meetings with political and business leaders and festive meals in the capital. Each took a side trip to the west of the other’s nation. Both visits took about the same time.
A precedent was set by then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) in 1997 and US president Bill Clinton in 1998. Jiang made a state visit to Washington, Clinton to Beijing. Jiang addressed an audience at Harvard, Clinton at Peking University. Jiang visited an early English colony in Williamsburg, Virginia, Clinton went to the ancient capital in Xian. Jiang was in the US for nine days, the Chinese insisted that Clinton spend the same time in China.
In contrast, Xi said in Washington that “China is the world’s largest developing country, while the United States is the largest developed country.” The Chinese have long contended they were thus justified in protecting trade and investment, insisting on technology transfers, and grudgingly safeguarding the intellectual property of others.
Xi, son of guerrilla leader and former Chinese vice premier Xi Zhongxun (習仲勛), was careful throughout his visit to toe the party line, for several reasons. Over the past 40 years, he has risen through the ranks of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by staying close to the party’s positions.
Second, while Xi Jinping is expected to succeed Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) as CCP general secretary, leader of the country and chairman of the Central Military Commission later this year, he is not there yet. As any American nominee for a position requiring US Senate confirmation will attest, to speak out before taking office could be seen as presumptuous and the kiss of death.
Third, Xi Jinping, like Hu and Jiang before him, cannot hope to have the authority of former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東), who dominated Chinese politics from 1949 to 1976, or Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), the paramount leader until 1997. The regime in Beijing has evolved into a collective rule in which the top leader appears to be but the first among equals.
In particular, Xi Jinping could make no new policy on security or agreements with the US because he does not yet have the blessing of the People’s Liberation Army, an increasingly independent institution. Among Xi Jinping’s earliest tasks will be to cultivate its allegiance.
US-China relations got thrown into the US presidential election campaign last week when Mitt Romney, the leading candidate for the Republican nomination, tore into US President Barack Obama’s China policy in an op-ed article in the Wall Street Journal.
Dealing with China, he wrote, “means shoring up our fiscal and economic standing, rebuilding our military, and renewing faith in our values. We must apply these strengths in our policy toward China.” Obama “is moving in precisely the wrong direction,” the former governor of Massachusetts wrote. “The shining accomplishment of the meetings in Washington this week with Xi Jinping — China’s vice president and likely future leader — was empty pomp and ceremony.”
White House press secretary Jay Carney was asked to respond while aboard Air Force One, flying from San Francisco to Seattle on Friday. He asserted that the administration had worked “very constructively” with China. On Xi Jinping’s visit, he said, “we were very candid in our discussions with the Chinese about areas not only where we seek to cooperate in regional and global affairs, but also where we have disagreements and concerns.”
In Beijing, a vigorous debate on China’s relations with the US goes on all the time, but behind the closed doors of the politburo. Xi Jinping can expect to be closely quizzed about what he learned in the US, but the Chinese will get only a sanitized version of that report in the press.
Richard Halloran is a media commentator based in Hawaii.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China