Two years after giving away the baby boy she had carried for nine months, Gao cries less. His new mom treats him well, and she finds comfort in the smiling family photos uploaded online. Besides, she has her own biological seven-year-old to care for — and she’s busy searching for another infertile couple seeking a womb.
Gao is one of China’s surrogate mothers working underground for vast sums of money to deliver children to wannabe parents. The “rent a womb” industry, which inhabits a legal gray area, came under fire in December when it emerged that a wealthy couple in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, paid nearly 1 million yuan (US$158,770) to have eight babies simultaneously, using two surrogates. For a country that limits families to one child, the babaotai chuanwen or “eight baby scandal” — unearthed when the babies’ portrait was used to advertise a photography studio — made national headlines.
As China enters the Year of the Dragon, the surrogate industry is preparing for an upswing in business with parents rushing to have a baby in the luckiest lunar year. Shanghai authorities expect 180,000 babies to be born this year, 10 percent more than last year, according to the Shanghai population commission. Countries with a strong Chinese diaspora typically experience a boom in “dragon” babies, as the creature is associated with might, intelligence and is historically linked to emperors.
Gao, who didn’t want to give her real name, also feels a sense of urgency.
“I hope I can find the next client before March, as I’m already 32 and the time left for me [to be a surrogate] is limited,” she said.
Like many surrogates, Gao is from one of China’s remote regions, in her case the most northeastern province, Heilongjiang.
Two years ago, she received 200,000 yuan for her services to an infertile, middle-aged couple from the affluent former capital, Nanjing. Surrogates can earn anything from 100,000 yuan to more than 300,000 yuan, approximately 120 times the average monthly salary of a graduate in Beijing. Though there is no specific law relating to surrogacy in China, in 2001 the industry was driven underground when the Ministry of Health banned trade in fertilized eggs and embryos, forbidding hospitals from performing surrogacy procedures.
Regulations are openly flouted. While there is no official count, the Guangzhou-based newspaper Southern Metropolis Weekly last year estimated that 250,000 surrogate children had been born in China in the past 30 years. More than 100 surrogacy agencies advertise online. Given that 10 percent of couples struggle with infertility — a rate that is on the rise according to the ministry — there is a potentially huge market for surrogacy in China.
“Parents living in Shanghai or Beijing have to travel to far-flung cities such as Wuhan, Harbin and Hohhot to meet a surrogate mother and find a hospital willing to finish the transplantation,” said Zhou, a surrogacy agent in Shanghai, who requested just her family name be used.
Most couple-surrogate pairings are arranged through Internet-based agencies, with agents expected to find one or two surrogates each month, earning 2,000 yuan for each, Zhou said.
During pregnancy, surrogates are often contractually obliged to reside in a “surrogate dorm,” where they share rooms, are cared for by nannies and are governed by a strict set of rules. At Zhou’s agency, violations include being awake after 9.30pm and telling friends and relatives the dorm’s whereabouts. Surrogates who flout the rules are subject to a fine (typically 500 yuan) and may lose their end of the contract.
Many infertile parents are willing to pay any price for a precious single child.
“You suffer psychological torture from the fear you will never have a child,” said Li, 42, a father whose child was born through a surrogate and who requested his name be changed. “Then you fear that something will happen when the surrogate mother is pregnant, and then, even when you have the child in your arms, you begin to worry that someone will discover the truth.”
Li, who owns a chain of restaurants in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, has a seven-year-old daughter, but is planning to have a dragon boy.
Though the ministry stipulates that the use of reproduction techniques such as in-vitro fertilization must conform to China’s “family planning policy,” surrogacy is one way moneyed parents bypass the one-child rule.
“There are some parents trying to avoid one-child policy by surrogacy, but I think the practice should be governed by some laws or rules,” said Zhai Zhenwu, director of Renmin University’s school of sociology and population.
“It’s unfair to poor citizens to whom it seems the rich can have as many children as they want. It’s another negative signal to society that money can buy anything, when we should be teaching people that the golden key can’t open every door,” Zhai said.
However, for women such as Gao, the decision to surrogate isn’t an ethical one: It provides her family with much-needed cash. Though her husband cared for her in their home during her first surrogacy, for the next Gao plans to move out of town.
“My relatives and neighbors would be skeptical if I tell them the baby is stillborn again,” she said.
Additional reporting by Xia Keyu
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath