After having lost the presidential election, all the air seems to have gone out of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). It is engaging in post-defeat analysis, but not very willingly. Apart from that, there are the media reports on the infighting over who will take over the party leadership when DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) steps down. However, where is the DPP in all this?
China has already sent its people over here to inspect the election gains. Taiwan Affairs Office Vice Minister Zheng Lizhong (鄭立中) is traveling around southern Taiwan and Beijing Mayor Guo Jinlong (郭金龍) is leading a 500-strong delegation to Taipei to congratulate the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership — but where is the DPP?
When Zheng visited Taichung in 2009, DPP supporters launched strong protests. Why are they doing nothing this time around? Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬) said she suspects Zheng of plotting and scheming and she openly claimed that he has political motives. However, what good are suspicions or open claims when the DPP is just sitting around doing nothing to try to stop Zheng? What good is such an opposition party to Taiwan?
Guo is a thug who kills Tibetans, persecutes Falun Gong followers and oppresses Taiwanese businesspeople based in China. He has bloods on his hands. Can the DPP stand coolly by and do nothing?
Chang Ching-hsi (張清溪), chairman of the Taiwanese Falun Dafa Association, and a team of lawyers filed a lawsuit against Guo at the High Court, accusing him of human rights violations, while Tibetan organizations are following him around and protesting whereever he goes. In Beijing, an angry Ai Weiwei (艾未未) broke off cooperation with the Taipei Fine Arts Museum on publication of a commemorative book in protest at Guo’s invitation to Taipei — but where is the DPP?
The DPP is the biggest opposition party and it is also a pro-localization party. Even more importantly, the DPP is a party founded on principles of justice, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. What is going on? The DPP can’t even measure up to the Falun Gong or Tibetan organizations, and in Beijing, Ai is not afraid to stand up for what he believes — but where is the DPP?
The DPP seems to place discourse first. The post-election analysis is all about discourse and the party’s ability to act is nowhere to be found.
However, we must not forget that action is at the core of discourse. Without action, there is only discourse, talk and hot air. Frankly speaking, no amount of post-election analysis can make up for real action.
If only the DPP could lead Taiwanese in taking action and protesting against the Chinese Communist Party bandits Zheng and Guo, and if only they could take action to highlight Taiwan’s sovereignty and universal values, then who cares if there is any post-election analysis, or how much analysis there is? We don’t need a castrated opposition party.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath