Following the crisis at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in March last year, academics from a dozen universities and colleges conducted a study on how their students and other members of the public felt about nuclear power in Taiwan. The study showed that Taiwanese are almost universally uneasy about the country’s nuclear power plants and that a very high percentage hope a more effective renewable energy source can be found.
The state-run Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) and the Ministry of Economic Affairs have for some time been engaged in scaremongering, telling the public that the country is an island nation with few energy resources. Without nuclear power, so their argument goes, we would not be able to produce enough power, which would lead to higher electricity bills. However, is this really the case?
According to international organizations, such as the US’ Bureau of International Information Programs (IIP), Taiwan is, shockingly, ranked 14th in the world in terms of power usage per person. Furthermore, the countries that rank above Taiwan in their power usage are either those in colder climes at higher latitudes — such as Finland, Sweden, Norway or Canada — or other countries in tropical regions that are much wealthier, such as oil-producing Kuwait and Bahrain.
Taiwan uses — or wastes — far more energy than more economically and industrially advanced nations that have no, or severely lack, natural energy resources, such as Singapore, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, the Netherlands and Israel.
So why do Taiwanese waste so much electricity? Taipower has consistently said that Taiwan has hot weather, so people need electricity to maintain a decent quality of life. This is muddle-headed and disingenuous. According to a report published in the April edition of CommonWealth Magazine last year, electricity is extremely cheap in Taiwan compared with other countries, which goes some way to explaining why the country is the biggest emitter of carbon per person in Asia, and among the top 18 emitters in the world.
This is nothing to be proud of. On average, each Taiwanese produces as much as 11.8 tonnes in carbon emissions every year. Carbon emissions per person in Taiwan have doubled since the 1990s, three times faster than the global average. A CommonWealth online survey shows that two-thirds of Taiwanese would be willing to pay higher energy bills if it meant wasting less energy, a conclusion borne out by research findings.
However, another surprise awaits us if we look more closely at the cost of electricity in Taiwan and that of other countries. On average, the cost of 1 kilowatt of electricity in Taiwan is unusually low compared to that in heavily industrialized countries that supply their own energy needs and still have a surplus to export, such as Canada, Dubai, France and Germany. Electricity prices in Taiwan are only higher, or comparable, to a small number of underdeveloped, non--industrial countries, such as Ukraine, Pakistan and Russia, suggesting that our energy policy is stuck in a model adopted 60 years ago, when we embarked on the process of industrialization. Consequently, we now rely on imported energy.
Taiwan long ago moved on from labor-intensive industries to finance and service industries. Our economy, driven by research and development and innovation, is now a knowledge economy, so why do we still employ an energy policy developed so long ago?
Taiwanese are now very environmentally conscious and aware of the need for sustainability. The government should exercise the utmost caution on this issue and take a leaf from the book of other countries and the energy policies they employ. We need to plant more trees nationwide to make this nation greener, and to promote a more sustainable future for Taiwan and the world. This is the only way we can wake up from this nuclear nightmare.
Peter Chang is a professor at Taipei Medical University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several