Following the crisis at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in March last year, academics from a dozen universities and colleges conducted a study on how their students and other members of the public felt about nuclear power in Taiwan. The study showed that Taiwanese are almost universally uneasy about the country’s nuclear power plants and that a very high percentage hope a more effective renewable energy source can be found.
The state-run Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) and the Ministry of Economic Affairs have for some time been engaged in scaremongering, telling the public that the country is an island nation with few energy resources. Without nuclear power, so their argument goes, we would not be able to produce enough power, which would lead to higher electricity bills. However, is this really the case?
According to international organizations, such as the US’ Bureau of International Information Programs (IIP), Taiwan is, shockingly, ranked 14th in the world in terms of power usage per person. Furthermore, the countries that rank above Taiwan in their power usage are either those in colder climes at higher latitudes — such as Finland, Sweden, Norway or Canada — or other countries in tropical regions that are much wealthier, such as oil-producing Kuwait and Bahrain.
Taiwan uses — or wastes — far more energy than more economically and industrially advanced nations that have no, or severely lack, natural energy resources, such as Singapore, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, the Netherlands and Israel.
So why do Taiwanese waste so much electricity? Taipower has consistently said that Taiwan has hot weather, so people need electricity to maintain a decent quality of life. This is muddle-headed and disingenuous. According to a report published in the April edition of CommonWealth Magazine last year, electricity is extremely cheap in Taiwan compared with other countries, which goes some way to explaining why the country is the biggest emitter of carbon per person in Asia, and among the top 18 emitters in the world.
This is nothing to be proud of. On average, each Taiwanese produces as much as 11.8 tonnes in carbon emissions every year. Carbon emissions per person in Taiwan have doubled since the 1990s, three times faster than the global average. A CommonWealth online survey shows that two-thirds of Taiwanese would be willing to pay higher energy bills if it meant wasting less energy, a conclusion borne out by research findings.
However, another surprise awaits us if we look more closely at the cost of electricity in Taiwan and that of other countries. On average, the cost of 1 kilowatt of electricity in Taiwan is unusually low compared to that in heavily industrialized countries that supply their own energy needs and still have a surplus to export, such as Canada, Dubai, France and Germany. Electricity prices in Taiwan are only higher, or comparable, to a small number of underdeveloped, non--industrial countries, such as Ukraine, Pakistan and Russia, suggesting that our energy policy is stuck in a model adopted 60 years ago, when we embarked on the process of industrialization. Consequently, we now rely on imported energy.
Taiwan long ago moved on from labor-intensive industries to finance and service industries. Our economy, driven by research and development and innovation, is now a knowledge economy, so why do we still employ an energy policy developed so long ago?
Taiwanese are now very environmentally conscious and aware of the need for sustainability. The government should exercise the utmost caution on this issue and take a leaf from the book of other countries and the energy policies they employ. We need to plant more trees nationwide to make this nation greener, and to promote a more sustainable future for Taiwan and the world. This is the only way we can wake up from this nuclear nightmare.
Peter Chang is a professor at Taipei Medical University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in