Work for change in Taiwan
As the clock is ticking toward the crucial date that will determine the future of our beloved homeland, it’s time for all patriotic Taiwanese to make concerted efforts and forge a united front to defeat the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is bent on moving Taiwan closer to the fold of China in cahoots with the chieftains in Beijing to realize their cherished dream of “reunification” for their “Great Mother China.”
We have lately seen many female leaders, in many parts of the world, emerge and change the political map of the world, and Taiwan will certainly join this trend; it is prescient and we are hopeful.
Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has embodied this phenomenon: She has a combination of outstanding qualifications and unique experiences, she has dramatically reversed the tide and her campaign is gaining traction, in spite of the smear attacks and allegations by the sinister KMT regime.
It was further demonstrated by her recent visits to the US cities and Japan — big crowds of supporters, including some crossing ethnic and party lines, turned out to greet her; a rare and heartening scene after decades of divide-and-rule tactics by the KMT regime. And, intriguingly, she was invited to Capitol Hill and, later, the Pentagon, which is extraordinary for a Taiwanese political leader and carries political nuances.
However, she has to face a rival from a regime skilled in the sinister cloak-and-dagger tactics that have characterized the political culture of China for centuries, and above all, financed by a fat, illegally acquired war-chest unrivaled by any political parties in the world.
Moreover, the dire international realities are not what we want to see: the looming of a strident hegemonic power with financial and military heft that intimidates many countries in the world at a time when the democratic countries in the West are preoccupied and struggling with economic problems after the financial implosion; it would be unrealistic to expect the support of the international community. Thus, her campaign strategy needs flexibility and pragmatism; and she is walking on a tight rope and has to cast as wide a net as possible.
She is attacked for her stance on Taiwan’s sovereignty by her rival — for denying the existence of the so-called “1992 consensus” — on the one hand, and criticized for stopping short of declaring Taiwan’s full-fledged sovereign status in its true name from some Taiwan-centric groups.
To rebut the attacks and criticism, her answer is clear: flat denial of the existence of the “1992 consensus” and the proposal of a “Taiwan consensus” (which has been brewing over the last two decades among the voters) — “Taiwan is the Republic of China (ROC) and the ROC is Taiwan, and Taiwan is my country.”
Recognizing the stark realities, she succinctly stated that the party is “operating in a far more complex global environment than ever before,” and “as a responsible political party, our policy must be in line with the mainstream consensus in our society as well as international expectations … and therefore will refrain from extreme or radical approaches.”
Clearly, the most important issue is the deterioration of the economy — income disparity and lack of job opportunities; voters are more concerned with their daily life, with the economy threatening the social stability and security of Taiwan. It’s patently clear that average people are worse off since the KMT regained power, and the gap between rich and poor is obscene.
Ma’s pet project, the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (which he rammed through the KMT-controlled Legislative Yuan) has failed to achieve what he promised. On the contrary, it has caused more hollowing-out of Taiwanese industries and capital outflows. In fact, his design is to make Taiwan more dependent on China and to dovetail Taiwan with China economically and socially, to ultimately bring about “reunification.”
Tsai’s approach is to move Taiwan closer to the international community and integrate with the global market. She wants to develop new industries (including new sources of energy for the prosperity and security of Taiwan), protect small and medium-sized businesses rooted in Taiwan and create a more fair and equitable society.
To help her accomplish all of this and to realize our dreams, we have to close ranks in solidarity to support her and make her the next president, with a new legislative branch, which has long been a tool for the KMT.
We hope and pray that a new Taiwan — the Republic of Taiwan will eventually appear on the world map.
Knowledgeable people in the world all know well that the “ROC” is a myth and China does not have sovereignty over Taiwan, despite its groundless claim. Indeed, the nomenclature of the “ROC” is a curse and nightmarish reminder for Taiwanese, especially for the older generations, and that mantle has become the anathema of Taiwan in the international community.
We hope Tsai will set a new agenda for the future of our beloved Mother Taiwan through a referendum and let Taiwanese decide their political future; it is our dream.
Most importantly, Taiwan needs political reforms to sweep away its corrupt political culture, and we Taiwanese need a soul search — for so many of our compatriots lack a strong sense of social justice and moral character, and are vulnerable to the Chinese ugly polity — vote buying and misplaced loyalty. We have seen so many shameless collaborators who are so sheepishly obedient and subservient, obsequiously following their arrogant KMT masters.
We hope and pray that Tsai will be the next president and will set a new milestone — creating a truly free and democratic nation as a shining example of democracy and freedom, and a beacon for the oppressed people in the world, especially the hapless Chinese under the authoritarian government in Beijing. Voting for the KMT candidate would send the wrong message to the world.
Andrew Chang
Peoria, Arizona
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath