During the three-and-a-half years since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office, relations across the Taiwan Strait have been stable, Taiwan has made some breakthroughs in its foreign relations and last year the nation’s economic growth rate reached 10.88 percent. So why does opinion poll after opinion poll show that Ma is facing an uphill battle to get re-elected?
It is not because people in Taiwan are unaware of Ma’s policy achievements, but because most people are not satisfied with them.
In a survey conducted by Global Views Monthly (遠見) in May, 54.3 percent of respondents said they were dissatisfied with Ma’s performance, while only 33.9 percent were satisfied. As to Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), 48.2 percent of those surveyed said they were dissatisfied with his performance and only 38.5 percent said they were satisfied.
When asked to compare Ma’s term in office with the period in which the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was in power, 30.3 percent of those surveyed felt that Ma’s performance was better, while 38.5 percent thought things had got worse and 24.6 percent said there was not much difference.
Ma’s cross-strait policies had a relatively high approval rate, with 49.9 percent of respondents taking the view that they had been successful, but this was still less than half.
In an opinion poll conducted by the TV station TVBS in February, 53 percent of Taiwanese surveyed felt that Ma’s policies were pro-China, which is 11 percent more than at the time of Ma’s inauguration. This suggests that more than half of the public may have reservations about Ma’s future policies with regards to cross-strait relations because they are worried that if Ma is re-elected, he may go on to make concessions to China on political issues.
When asked about foreign policy achievements, 43.5 percent of those surveyed thought that the Ma government’s overseas policies had been successful, but the percentage who thought they had been a failure climbed from 28.8 percent in May 2009 to 40.5 percent in May this year.
China has shown goodwill to the Ma administration by exercising restraint, for instance by consenting to let Taiwan take part in the World Health Assembly as an observer. This detente has allowed Taiwan to maintain diplomatic relations with 23 countries without having to pay for it by making huge aid donations. Nonetheless, close to half of the public seem to be unimpressed by these breakthroughs.
The area in which the Ma government has really lost a lot of points is economic performance. During his campaign in the run-up to the 2008 presidential election, Ma promised that he could achieve 6 percent annual economic growth, bring unemployment down to 3 percent and raise per capita GDP to US$30,000 by the end of his four years in office.
In reality, Ma has fallen well short of this “6-3-3” campaign pledge. Average economic growth over the past three years has been just 3.6 percent, while unemployment has stood at 5 percent on average and average per capita GDP at the end of last year was less than US$20,000. Although the economy grew by 10.88 percent last year, that was only possible because of a rebound from negative 1.93 percent growth in 2009 in the wake of the global financial crisis.
What is even worse is that the great majority of people have not enjoyed a share of the fruits of the growth that has taken place. If all the households in the country are divided into five quintiles according to disposable household income, the income of the top 20 percent was 6.34 times that of the bottom 20 percent in 2009, second only to the 6.39 times reported in 2001. The figure for last year was 6.19 times — the third-biggest difference in history and much higher than the 5.98 times recorded in 2007. In the second quarter of this year, Taiwan had 276,128 people living in 114,437 low-income households. Both these numbers are record highs and considerably higher than the 209,945 people in 87,664 low-income households recorded in the second quarter of 2008.
The average real monthly salary for January to October was NT$43,287 (US$1,429.42), which is less than it was in 1999 in real terms. Salaries have fallen back to the level of 13 years ago. Moreover, in 2007, the number of employed people earning less than NT$20,000 a month was 805,000, but last year that figure went up to 1.038 million — a rise of 230,000 in three years. In 2007, 3.308 million employed people earned less than NT$30,000 a month, but that figure grew to 3.597 million people last year — 290,000 more than three years before.
This year’s jobless figures have fallen compared with 2009, but as of September, the unemployment rate still stood at 4.28 percent. That is not just the highest jobless rate among the East Asian “Tiger” economies, but also higher than the 3.8 percent unemployment rate recorded in May 2008, when the former DPP administration left office.
The unemployment situation for people aged between 20 and 24 is particularly bad. Unemployment in that age group stood at 13 percent in September after reaching an historic high of 14.7 percent in 2009. By comparison, the youth unemployment rate in 2007 was 10.6 percent.
These figures set the scene for the Jan. 14 election.
Most people are not satisfied with the Ma administration’s performance and many people think it has done worse than the preceding DPP government. This is going to make it very hard for Ma to get re-elected and it explains why he keeps reverting to cross-strait issues, an area in which he has something of an advantage.
All in all, this election will be a contest between DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) social class issues and Ma’s cross-strait issues. Who will win and who will lose will be decided according to how Taiwanese voters judge the rival candidates and their policies on Jan. 14.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor in the Graduate Institute of Development Studies at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS