Have all state resources become campaign tools for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) re-election bid? This appears to be a valid concern in light of a recent series of incidents which suggest the possible exploitation of government resources for partisan gain.
First, it was reported that in a notice recently mailed by the Ministry of the Interior to low-income and disadvantaged families informing them of the new social welfare subsidies, which come into effect on Sunday, the ministry made special mention of Ma’s name, with Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) saying in the opening paragraph that the program was made possible “under President Ma’s directive.” Similar phrases of praise were also spotted in letters of notification mailed out by other agencies, such as the Council of Labor Affairs, informing the public of new policies which also take effect on Sunday.
Despite previous notification letters seldom giving a president credit for implementing new subsidy programs, it is little wonder that under the Ma government such phrases appeared in the letters mailed out by agencies.
Then came an even more absurd piece of news on Tuesday: That former deputy legislative speaker Yao Eng-chi (饒穎奇), who once served in the military police, reportedly delivered a speech at the Military Police Command on Dec. 10 in support of Ma’s re-election bid. Whatever happened to the armed forces’ repeated calls for personnel to maintain administrative neutrality?
This is not the end of it. Just when one wonders how the government can get more ridiculous, it was reported yesterday that a group of prosecutors intercepted a tour bus in Greater Kaohsiung, claiming they had received a tip-off that the passengers, returning from a wedding banquet in Taipei, had actually been on an outing in exchange for supporting the pan-green camp. It was only after the passengers produced video clips of the wedding showing that no pan-green candidates attended the event, but rather a pan-blue candidate, that the prosecutors stopped their questioning and left.
Granted, the prosecutors might very well have been doing their job — probing vote-buying allegations. However, by virtue of doing their job, weren’t they supposed to first verify the tip before launching an action that harassed people and created a public impression that a particular political camp is engaging in illegal campaign actions?
Last, but not least, Next Magazine carried a report yesterday alleging that the National Security Council head acted beyond his scope by instructing the Ministry of Justice’s Investigation Bureau to monitor Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) campaign information.
One can’t help but wonder whether all spheres of government — including the administration, judiciary and intelligence services — have now been caught in a certain political camp’s claws, in which they exploit government resources for a certain individual’s and party’s gain — and more despicably, using taxpayers’ money to do so.
Maybe it is time the president and his government revisit the meaning of the term administrative neutrality and prove to the Taiwanese that they can walk the walk.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath