Nowadays there is no shortage of pundits, economic or otherwise, warning of impending disaster. If right, they are hailed as seers; if wrong, chances are that no one will remember. So here is a forecast: There will be no shortage of predictions that next year is shaping up as a disastrous year.
My view is different: Next year will not be a year of crisis, but nor will it bring an end to our current economic troubles. Rather, it will be a year of muddling through.
Many people think that next year will be the make-or-break year for Europe — either a quantum leap in European integration, with the creation of a fiscal union and the issuance of eurobonds, or the eurozone’s disintegration, igniting the mother of all financial crises.
In fact, neither scenario is plausible. The collapse of the eurozone would, of course, be an economic and financial calamity. However, that is precisely why the European Central Bank will overcome its reluctance and intervene in the Italian and Spanish bond markets, and why the Italian and Spanish governments will, in the end, use that breathing space to complete the reforms that the bank requires as a quid pro quo.
To be sure, Europe will not be spared the pain of a recession. A botched bank-recapitalization plan and the cloud of uncertainty hanging over the euro mean that recession is already baked in. Moreover, the pro-growth reforms needed in countries such as Italy will almost certainly make things worse before they make them better. For example, the initial effect of reducing hiring and firing costs will be layoffs of redundant workers. However, investors look ahead, so reforms that promise an eventual return to growth should reassure them.
While the eurozone is unlikely to collapse next yeear, there will be no definitive answer to the question of whether the euro will survive because there will be no quantum leap in European integration. Treaty revisions take time to draft — and more time to ratify. For example, efforts to strengthen Europe’s fiscal rules will take the form of bilateral agreements between governments, rather than changes in the EU’s Lisbon Treaty.
It is a sad state of affairs when a recession qualifies as muddling through. However, such is the European condition.
Consider next the US. While recent data suggest that the economy is doing better — all signs are that GDP will have expanded at a 3 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter of this year — it is important not get carried away. Fiscal support for the expansion will continue to be withdrawn. And, while the housing market shows some signs of stabilizing, prices will remain weighed down by the large shadow inventory of homes in foreclosure and held by banks.
These considerations suggest that the acceleration of US growth that began in the third quarter of this year is unlikely to be sustained. At the same time, if growth slows significantly, the US Federal Reserve will undoubtedly respond with another round of quantitative easing — QE3 by another name. Thus, while growth next year is likely to fall well short of 3 percent, the US should be able to avoid a double-dip recession.
Finally, China should grow by 7.5 percent to 8 percent next year. This is muddling through, Chinese style —considerably slower growth than the double-digit rates of the past, but not the hard landing that purveyors of doom and gloom warn is inevitable.
I am more pessimistic than institutions such as the World Bank and IMF, which anticipate Chinese growth of 8.5 percent to 9 percent next year — forecasts that do not take into account the sharp cooling of China’s housing market. Although weakening housing demand has not yet shown up in lower prices, the volume of transactions has fallen off dramatically. And where volumes lead, prices eventually follow.
Fortunately, China is still enough of a planned economy that officials can mobilize policies to cushion the impact. For example, if construction plummets the authorities can reduce reserve requirements, as they recently did, thereby encouraging banks to lend to other sectors. And, if the European and US economies avoid the worst, Chinese exports will hold up.
Thus, if all of the global economy’s largest pieces fall into place, there is no reason why next year should be a disaster. However, muddling through cannot continue forever. Europe needs to draw a line under its crisis and figure out how to grow, the US needs to overcome its political polarization and policy gridlock and China needs to rebalance its economy — shifting from construction and exports to household consumption as the main engine of growth — while it still has time.
Of course, if none of this happens — or if not enough of it does — 2013 could turn out to be the annus horribilis of the perma-bears’ dreams.
Barry Eichengreen is a professor of economics and political science at the University of California, Berkeley.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath