The Ministry of Transportation and Communications, which is supposed to be in charge of traffic safety, although that seems to be left to chance in most places, recently made a few amendments to the Road Traffic Security Rules (道路交通安全規則).
The first one is that foreigners no longer have to reapply for a driver’s license every time their Alien Resident Certificates expire, returning to the old system that foreigners’ Taiwanese driver’s licenses will now be valid for six years, just like those for Taiwanese.
That’s a step in the right direction for the ministry, but what’s more important is enforcing that motorists have licenses in the first place. What’s to stop foreign motorists from just driving without a license, given that the police normally let them off with a warning or just wave them away without checking as soon as they realize they’ve pulled over a foreign national?
A second rule change is that motorists are no longer allowed to have multimedia devices running when their vehicles’ engines are turned on. Somebody at the ministry must have recently taken a taxi ride that made him or her realize how dangerous it is to drive and watch soap operas or ball games at the same time.
Again, this regulation isn’t going far enough. What’s to stop a driver from turning on small LED screens in or over their dashboard so that they have something to watch when stopped at one of the numerous 90-second traffic lights? Police are so busy directing traffic that they can’t be asked to pay attention to this detail. The new fine will likely make motorists a little more cautious about how they go about using multimedia devices, but it won’t stop the practice altogether.
The key, like with all traffic rules, is enforcement. If a rule is not enforced, few people will follow it, even if it is for their own good.
Talking on cellphones was banned more than a decade ago and enforcement was strict initially. Today, drivers can be seen attempting maneuvers that need at least two hands on the wheel while using one hand to hold their cellphones up to their ears. More MRT and bus commuters and pedestrians use earphones with their cellphones than motorists do.
Another example is the right of way given to pedestrians. At a crosswalk where a motorist has a green light and a pedestrian has a walk signal, the motorist is supposed to wait for the pedestrian to cross the road before turning right across his path. This is actually a law and a motorist can be fined if he doesn’t give people on foot the right of way.
However, outside the initial campaign launch years ago and periodic refreshers when there has been a particularly gruesome accident drawing widespread media attention, this law, like many other related laws, is rarely enforced. It’s not uncommon to see police standing idly by as a motorist steps on the gas to get to a crosswalk a split second earlier than someone on foot so he can get through the light first. All too frequently there are near misses or accidents because of drivers’ impatient attitudes and misplaced sense of entitlement.
Another example of rules not being enforced is when taxi drivers almost kill people on scooters to catch a fare who inconsiderately hails the taxi without regard to anybody else on the road. Rules and fines have been discussed to address this situation, but it seems that nothing will stop taxi drivers from recklessly pulling to the side of the streets from the far left lane unless they are forced to do so.
Changing regulations to relax rules or create fines for improper behavior is meaningless if there is no enforcement to back up the rules. Police are trying to address this, but they rely too heavily on speed cameras and spot checks, while ignoring reckless driving and selfish behavior. Until these are addressed, using Taiwan’s streets will always have that third-world feel of risking one’s life at every moment.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a