President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is never afraid of making frequent and unpredictable policy flip-flops.
Following a closed-door meeting on Thursday night, the Cabinet decided to ditch its plan to increase the monthly subsidy for elderly farmers by NT$316, instead raising it by NT$1,000.
This change of heart came exactly one month after Ma announced the stingy NT$316 raise for farmers aged 65 and over to reflect the 5.27 percent average increase in the consumer price index over the past four years, when the subsidy was last adjusted.
And surprise, the new subsidy proposal is exactly the same as one by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
The irony in this abrupt about face is that Ma spent a great deal of time defending the original increase as a fair measure that avoided “political bargains” during the campaign season.
He also ignored warnings from KMT legislators from southern cities and counties who said a NT$316 increase would create a backlash among voters in agricultural areas.
So what changed Ma’s mind?
The president said he decided to review the issue after a meeting on Thursday with Taiwan Organization for Disadvantaged Patients secretary-general Yang Yu-hsing (楊玉欣) and other civic leaders to discuss subsidy programs.
Yang, who was nominated by the KMT on Wednesday as a legislator-at-large candidate, persuaded the president to increase the rise in the farmers’ subsidy, and subsidies for other disadvantaged groups, because many had not been changed for years. Making up for the shortfalls would help those in need, he said.
However, the real deciding factor behind the policy change was the plummeting support for Ma, especially in the south. KMT politicians unanimously urged the government to increase the subsidy and said voters in agricultural cities had come up with the slogan: “No NT$1,000, no votes.”
During his meeting with Yang, Ma said the government would increase the subsidy for elderly farmers and other disadvantaged groups, promising that the government would discuss the possibility of presenting a new version that could benefit more people while systemizing the subsidy programs.
Ma’s hastily arranged meeting with Yang on Thursday was a way for the president to show attention to Yang as a representative of disadvantaged groups. For Ma and the KMT, it was a way out of the subsidy plan predicament they are facing ahead of the elections.
After the subsidy revision was announced, Ma did not hesitate to acknowledge that the previous version had sparked accusations that the government was not giving enough assistance to farmers and other minority groups. When asked about the flip-flop, Ma’s running mate, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), told reporters that the initial increase, calculated in accordance with the estimated 5.27 percent rise in consumer prices, was “not good enough.”
Whether the new policy will boost support for Ma and the KMT remains to be seen, but it would not be surprising if the capricious Ma administration made more policy changes to please voters as the January presidential and legislative elections grow nearer.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath