Ma is different
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has complained that his proposed peace agreement with China has drawn criticism, whereas former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) were able to talk about the topic without such a backlash. Ma believe this double standard applies because he is a “Mainlander.”
However, if that were a big issue Ma would not have been elected president in 2008. The basic problem is his thinking and performance.
Ma’s father asked him to “dissolve independence and gradually achieve unification,” and Ma himself has declared a desire for “eventual unification.” He even named one of his daughters “Only China” (唯中) — nothing but China.
Ma thinks his peace proposal is exactly the camouflage he needs to pursue unification. His “golden decade” might mean unification in 10 years. He has completely forgotten his promise to not negotiate if China has missiles aimed at Taiwan.
There is a broad consensus in Taiwan that Ma is incompetent. Some people even call him a “Diarrhea Horse” or a poor performer. His lack of negotiating skills worries Taiwanese.
Ma loves Taiwan only when he runs for president. In the last election, he said he would be Taiwanese even after he was cremated. For next year’s election, he now says he is Taiwanese because his kin are buried in Taiwan.
Ma was acquitted of pocketing public money when he was Taipei City mayor. Chen has been jailed for years, ever since handing over power to Ma, and Lee is being indicted despite having left the presidential office 11 years ago. Ma is the only favorite son of the law.
When Wu Po-hsiung (吳伯雄) was Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman, Ma asked him to “divest the KMT of its assets,” but now that Ma is party chairman and president, he has decided to hold onto them for use in KMT campaigns. In contrast, Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-Wen (蔡英文) depends on small donations from the public.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Getting it right
The other day I received a letter from a top corporate newspaper company in Texas, delivered to my local post office box, with a computerized address label that correctly spelled my name and box number, but ended with the words: “Chiayi, Taiwan, -Province of China.”
Now I’ve seen everything. My address was printed on corporate stationary and was part of an window envelope. When I wrote back and told the company in question that Taiwan is not part of China and certainly not a province of China, a secretary wrote back and apologized for the mistake. She blamed it on the corporate computer that uses a “one China” map of foreign countries that simply does not list Taiwan as a nation.
This is not an isolated incident. In fact, many corporate computer systems in the US are incorrectly set up to address mail to Taiwan as a “Province of China.”
It is not the fault of the US Postal Service, it is the fault of the UN and those private companies that use Beijing-licensed addressing equipment.
Dan Bloom
Chiayi
The power of reading
Lii Ding-tzann (李丁讚) says that reading in a way that connects to your own life can make a powerful contribution to an individual’s intellectual development (“Reading your way to true wisdom,” Nov. 3, page 8). Research strongly supports his position. Studies show that wide, self-selected reading is related to literacy, knowledge of the world and achievements: People who read more, read and write better, know more and accomplish more in life.
Creativity researcher Dean Keith Simonton has concluded that “omnivorous reading in childhood and adolescence correlates positively with ultimate adult success.”
Strong evidence comes from cases of highly successful well-read individuals with little formal education. Famous examples include Thomas Edison, who profited from reading books in his father’s home library as well as the Detroit public library, and Michael Faraday, who had the good luck to work for a bookbinder and became an enthusiastic reader.
School can encourage or discourage reading. An over-emphasis on testing — a disease that seems to have spread world-wide — inhibits intellectual development by not allowing time for students to develop their own interests by reading widely.
However, schools can help students by exposing them to different ideas, giving them time to explore their interests and providing access to a print-rich environment.
Stephen Krashen
Los Angeles, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing