According to the UN’s Population Division, the world’s population hit 7 billion on Oct. 31. As always happens whenever we approach such a milestone, this one has produced a spike in conferences, seminars and learned articles, including the usual dire Malthusian predictions. After all, the UN forecasts that the world population will rise to 9.3 billion in 2050 and surpass 10 billion by the end of this century.
However, such forecasts misrepresent underlying demographic dynamics. The future we face is not one of too much population growth, but too little.
Most countries conducted their national population census last year and the data suggests that fertility rates are plunging in most of them. Birth rates have been low in developed countries for some time, but now they are falling rapidly in the majority of developing countries.
Chinese, Russians and Brazilians are no longer replacing themselves, while Indians are having far fewer children. Indeed, global fertility will fall to the replacement rate in a little more than a decade. Population might keep growing until mid-century, owing to rising longevity, but reproductively speaking, our species should no longer be expanding.
What demographers call the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) is the average number of live births per woman over her lifetime. In the long run, a population is said to be stable if the TFR is at the replacement rate, which is a little above 2.3 for the world as a whole and somewhat lower, at 2.1, for developed countries, reflecting their lower infant--mortality rates.
The TFR for most developed countries now stands well below replacement levels. The Organisation for Economic Co--operation and Development average is at about 1.74, but some countries, including Germany and Japan, produce less than 1.4 children per woman. -However, the biggest TFR declines in recent years have been in developing countries. The TFR in China and India was 6.1 and 5.9 respectively in 1950. It now stands at 1.8 in China, owing to the authorities’ aggressive one-child policy, while rapid urbanization and changing social attitudes have brought down India’s TFR to 2.6.
An additional factor could depress future birth rates in China and India. The Chinese census suggests that there are 118.6 boys being born for every 100 girls. Similarly, India has a gender ratio at birth of about 110 boys for every 100 girls, with large regional variations. Compare this with the natural ratio of 105 boys per 100 girls.
The deviation is usually attributed to a cultural preference for boys, which will take an additional toll on both populations, as the future scarcity of women implies that both countries’ effective reproductive capacity is below what is suggested by the unadjusted TFR.
Indeed, after adjusting for the gender imbalance, China’s Effective Fertility Rate (EFR) is about 1.5 and India’s is 2.45. In other words, the Chinese are very far from replacing themselves and the Indians are only slightly above the replacement rate.
The EFR stands at about 2.4 for the world as a whole, barely above the replacement rate. Current trends suggest that the human race will no longer be replacing itself by the early 2020s. Population growth after this will be mostly caused by people living longer, a factor that will diminish in significance from mid-century.
These shifts have important implications for the global labor supply. China is aging very rapidly and its working-age population will begin to shrink within a few years. Relaxing the one-child policy might have some positive impact in the very long run, but China is already past the tipping point, pushed there by the combined effect of gender imbalance and a very skewed age structure.
The number of women of child-bearing age (15 to 49 years) in China will drop 8 percent between last year and 2020, another 10 percent in the 2020s and, if not corrected, at an even faster pace thereafter. Therefore, China will have to withdraw an increasing proportion of its female workforce and deploy it for reproduction and childcare. Even if China can engineer this, it implies an immediate outflow from the workforce, with the benefits lagging by 25 years.
Meanwhile, the labor force has peaked or is close to peaking in most major economies. Germany, Japan and Russia already have declining workforces. The US is one of a handful of advanced countries with a growing workforce, owing to its relative openness to immigration, but this may change as the source countries become richer and undergo rapid declines in birth rates. Therefore, many developed countries will have to consider how to keep people working productively well into their 70s.
India, the only large economy whose workforce will grow in sufficient scale over the next three decades, could partly balance the declines expected in other major economies, but with birth rates declining there too, current trends suggest that its population will probably stabilize at 1.55 billion in the early 2050s, a full decade ahead of — and 170 million people below — the UN’s forecast.
Given this, it is likely that the world population will peak at 9 billion in the 2050s, a half-century sooner than generally anticipated, followed by a sharp decline. One could argue that this is a good thing, in view of the planet’s limited carrying capacity, but when demographic dynamics turn, the world will have to confront a different set of problems.
Sanjeev Sanyal is global strategist at Deutsche Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing