Although the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government wowed the public with celebrations to commemorate the centennial of the Republic of China (ROC) on Monday, the climax of which regaled spectators with a magnificent fireworks display at Changhua’s Lukang Township (鹿港), in addition to a musical titled Dreamers tailor-made for the occasion, many wondered whethert the centennial project’s price tag of NT$3.3 billion (US$109 million) might have been better spent on things that would more directly benefit Taiwanese.
Amid speculation that the government’s centennial project was a brazen political stunt designed to reassert the connection between Taiwan and China, the huge budget for the celebration has also led to criticism that the Ma administration deliberately chose to prioritize superficiality and self-aggrandizement over substance and practicality.
It was only last month that Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) said the nation’s precarious finances meant the government was unable to fulfill a pledge, made in 2007, to increase the monthly subsidy for elderly farmers to NT$10,000.
As a result, lawmakers from the KMT and Democratic Progressive Party continue to wrangle over by how much the current subsidy of NT$6,000 should be increased and whether richer farmers should receive the subsidy or not.
In view of the money spent on the centennial project, consider how easily the issue of the subsidy could have been resolved if only a small portion of that funding had been diverted to the nation’s elderly farmers.
It is also hard to forget frequent protestations from the Sports Affairs Council, Council of Cultural Affairs and other government agencies that tight budgets prohibit them from supporting the nation’s budding athletes and artists.
One marvels at the achievements of the many cultural and sports groups that have made international breakthroughs with little or no government support, but what about students who cannot afford school lunch programs and the underprivileged who are unable to pay their health insurance?
Imagine how a fraction of the funds lavished on the centennial project could have kept students well-fed and ensured the sick were taken care of. In addition, with such sensible spending of taxpayers’ money, the government would also have earned public respect and trust.
The truth is that if the government really wanted to help disadvantaged groups it could do so right now, as long as it focused on substance over showiness.
Earlier this month, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) outlined his vision for social justice in Taiwan as one of the goals for national development over the next decade.
If the Ma administration really wanted to improve social welfare policy, it would start by tackling the issues head-on rather than waxing lyrical about them as part of an extravagant scheme that will need 10 years before any results become evident.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath