People throughout the world and Taiwan celebrated the ninth World Day against the Death Penalty yesterday by calling on governments still using the death penalty to stop executions and join the global trend toward the abolition of corporal punishment.
People are carrying on the fight in the name of Troy Davis, who, in spite of worldwide campaigns, was executed in the US on Sept. 21. In a conversation with Amnesty International shortly before his death, he reminded the world that: “The struggle for justice doesn’t end with me. This struggle is for all the Troy Davises who came before me and all the ones who will come after me.”
Taiwan’s Chiou Ho-shun (邱和順) might be one of those. He has spent more than 20 years on death row, and like Davis, there are also doubts about the case against him. Davis was sentenced to death in 1991 for the murder of off-duty police officer Mark MacPhail in Savannah, Georgia. The case against Davis primarily rested on witness testimony. Since his 1991 trial, seven of nine key prosecution witnesses recanted or changed their testimony, some alleging police coercion.
Chiou and his co-defendants say they were held incommunicado for the first four months of their detention and they were tortured to make them confess to the kidnapping and killing of Lu Cheng (陸正) and the murder of Ko Hung Yu-lan (柯洪玉蘭). They later retracted their confessions. In 1994, after an official investigation, two public prosecutors and 10 police officers handling the case were convicted of extracting confessions through torture.
However, the death penalty is irrevocable. Taiwan knows this all too well. In February, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) apologized for the execution of an innocent man in 1997, former airman Chiang Kuo-ching (江國慶).
More countries realize every year that the only way to ensure mistakes like this are never made is to abolish the death penalty. The death penalty has been legally or practically abolished by 139 countries. Of the remaining 58 retentionist countries, only 23 committed an execution last year.
Last year, more states than ever before voted at the UN in favor of a worldwide moratorium on executions and this year in the US, Illinois became the 16th state to abolish the death penalty.
In Taiwan, last year’s four executions and the five this year stand in stark, disturbing contrast to the rising tide of world opinion in favor of abolition.
Countries that insist on using the death penalty continue to say they use it only in accordance with international law. However, most of their actions blatantly contradict these claims. It is often imposed after unfair trials and based on confessions extracted through torture. It is often used against political opponents, poor people and other marginalized groups. It is sometimes even used against people who allegedly committed crimes when they were under the age of 18 or who have significant mental impairments.
Taiwan acts contrary to international law because it provides no procedure that would allow people sentenced to death to seek a pardon or commutation of the sentence — a right recognized by the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Taiwan has legally committed to implement.
Taiwan was once considered a leader in Asia in the movement to abolish the death penalty, but the recent executions are a step backward. If Taiwan is really committed to ending executions, then it should start by commuting the death sentences of all people currently threatened with execution.
The struggle for abolition continues in the name of Davis, Chiang, Chiou and all the others facing execution around the world.
Roseann Rife is head of special projects and global thematic issues at Amnesty International’s International Secretariat.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS