People throughout the world and Taiwan celebrated the ninth World Day against the Death Penalty yesterday by calling on governments still using the death penalty to stop executions and join the global trend toward the abolition of corporal punishment.
People are carrying on the fight in the name of Troy Davis, who, in spite of worldwide campaigns, was executed in the US on Sept. 21. In a conversation with Amnesty International shortly before his death, he reminded the world that: “The struggle for justice doesn’t end with me. This struggle is for all the Troy Davises who came before me and all the ones who will come after me.”
Taiwan’s Chiou Ho-shun (邱和順) might be one of those. He has spent more than 20 years on death row, and like Davis, there are also doubts about the case against him. Davis was sentenced to death in 1991 for the murder of off-duty police officer Mark MacPhail in Savannah, Georgia. The case against Davis primarily rested on witness testimony. Since his 1991 trial, seven of nine key prosecution witnesses recanted or changed their testimony, some alleging police coercion.
Chiou and his co-defendants say they were held incommunicado for the first four months of their detention and they were tortured to make them confess to the kidnapping and killing of Lu Cheng (陸正) and the murder of Ko Hung Yu-lan (柯洪玉蘭). They later retracted their confessions. In 1994, after an official investigation, two public prosecutors and 10 police officers handling the case were convicted of extracting confessions through torture.
However, the death penalty is irrevocable. Taiwan knows this all too well. In February, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) apologized for the execution of an innocent man in 1997, former airman Chiang Kuo-ching (江國慶).
More countries realize every year that the only way to ensure mistakes like this are never made is to abolish the death penalty. The death penalty has been legally or practically abolished by 139 countries. Of the remaining 58 retentionist countries, only 23 committed an execution last year.
Last year, more states than ever before voted at the UN in favor of a worldwide moratorium on executions and this year in the US, Illinois became the 16th state to abolish the death penalty.
In Taiwan, last year’s four executions and the five this year stand in stark, disturbing contrast to the rising tide of world opinion in favor of abolition.
Countries that insist on using the death penalty continue to say they use it only in accordance with international law. However, most of their actions blatantly contradict these claims. It is often imposed after unfair trials and based on confessions extracted through torture. It is often used against political opponents, poor people and other marginalized groups. It is sometimes even used against people who allegedly committed crimes when they were under the age of 18 or who have significant mental impairments.
Taiwan acts contrary to international law because it provides no procedure that would allow people sentenced to death to seek a pardon or commutation of the sentence — a right recognized by the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Taiwan has legally committed to implement.
Taiwan was once considered a leader in Asia in the movement to abolish the death penalty, but the recent executions are a step backward. If Taiwan is really committed to ending executions, then it should start by commuting the death sentences of all people currently threatened with execution.
The struggle for abolition continues in the name of Davis, Chiang, Chiou and all the others facing execution around the world.
Roseann Rife is head of special projects and global thematic issues at Amnesty International’s International Secretariat.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did