People throughout the world and Taiwan celebrated the ninth World Day against the Death Penalty yesterday by calling on governments still using the death penalty to stop executions and join the global trend toward the abolition of corporal punishment.
People are carrying on the fight in the name of Troy Davis, who, in spite of worldwide campaigns, was executed in the US on Sept. 21. In a conversation with Amnesty International shortly before his death, he reminded the world that: “The struggle for justice doesn’t end with me. This struggle is for all the Troy Davises who came before me and all the ones who will come after me.”
Taiwan’s Chiou Ho-shun (邱和順) might be one of those. He has spent more than 20 years on death row, and like Davis, there are also doubts about the case against him. Davis was sentenced to death in 1991 for the murder of off-duty police officer Mark MacPhail in Savannah, Georgia. The case against Davis primarily rested on witness testimony. Since his 1991 trial, seven of nine key prosecution witnesses recanted or changed their testimony, some alleging police coercion.
Chiou and his co-defendants say they were held incommunicado for the first four months of their detention and they were tortured to make them confess to the kidnapping and killing of Lu Cheng (陸正) and the murder of Ko Hung Yu-lan (柯洪玉蘭). They later retracted their confessions. In 1994, after an official investigation, two public prosecutors and 10 police officers handling the case were convicted of extracting confessions through torture.
However, the death penalty is irrevocable. Taiwan knows this all too well. In February, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) apologized for the execution of an innocent man in 1997, former airman Chiang Kuo-ching (江國慶).
More countries realize every year that the only way to ensure mistakes like this are never made is to abolish the death penalty. The death penalty has been legally or practically abolished by 139 countries. Of the remaining 58 retentionist countries, only 23 committed an execution last year.
Last year, more states than ever before voted at the UN in favor of a worldwide moratorium on executions and this year in the US, Illinois became the 16th state to abolish the death penalty.
In Taiwan, last year’s four executions and the five this year stand in stark, disturbing contrast to the rising tide of world opinion in favor of abolition.
Countries that insist on using the death penalty continue to say they use it only in accordance with international law. However, most of their actions blatantly contradict these claims. It is often imposed after unfair trials and based on confessions extracted through torture. It is often used against political opponents, poor people and other marginalized groups. It is sometimes even used against people who allegedly committed crimes when they were under the age of 18 or who have significant mental impairments.
Taiwan acts contrary to international law because it provides no procedure that would allow people sentenced to death to seek a pardon or commutation of the sentence — a right recognized by the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Taiwan has legally committed to implement.
Taiwan was once considered a leader in Asia in the movement to abolish the death penalty, but the recent executions are a step backward. If Taiwan is really committed to ending executions, then it should start by commuting the death sentences of all people currently threatened with execution.
The struggle for abolition continues in the name of Davis, Chiang, Chiou and all the others facing execution around the world.
Roseann Rife is head of special projects and global thematic issues at Amnesty International’s International Secretariat.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS