In 2008, then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) made economic revival the focus of his election campaign, aggressively promoting his “6-3-3” pledge (annual GDP growth of 6 percent, annual per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of less than 3 percent per year) and the slogan “We are ready.”
However, as the next presidential election approaches, Ma has stopped talking about the economy and standard of living — with the exception of bragging about how he had slashed the price of cooking rice wine. Instead, his remarks now focus on the so-called “1992 consensus” and cross-strait relations, as he attempts to direct the presidential election with the help of the “one China” issue that the KMT and Chinese Communist Party have purportedly defined between themselves.
It seems Taiwan is now a model of harmony and happiness where everyone is both wealthy and healthy and where problems related to the economy or standard of living no longer exist.
It is not very difficult to understand why Ma has shifted the focus from the economy to political issues: The economic promises he made then, including his “6-3-3” campaign pledge and forecast that the local stock market would break 10,000 points, are no longer worth the paper they were written on. Add to this the government’s failure to effectively respond to the economic crisis in the US and the eurozone debt dilemma.
To avoid shooting himself in the foot, Ma has therefore been compelled to play up the political unification-independence issue. Only by manipulating this issue can he bring the election campaign down to a political war of words between the pan-blue and the pan-green camps. This attempt to avoid economic issues and force voters to align themselves along pan-blue and pan-green ideological lines is proof of the government’s incompetence.
Most economic problems are of course a product of the macroenvironment. A good example of this is how Ma routinely blames the difficult economic situation on the global financial crisis. However, problems such as an expanding wealth gap, the working poor and youth unemployment are getting worse, and a feeling of relative deprivation is spreading throughout society.
These issues are not simply economic issues, but manifestations of the government’s incompetence: They are the result of the government’s inability to adapt and respond to rapid changes in the global environment.
Ma is still using the same destructive and wasteful ideas he adopted during his tenure as Taipei mayor. In addition to using government resources to consolidate pan-blue voter support, he issues debt and continues to waste money left and right to make up for his administration’s bad economic performance.
Today, as globalization is seeping into every corner of the nation, the role and the importance of the government in confronting economic challenges have changed.
A responsible and capable government must insist on promoting justice and fairness, caring for the disadvantaged and promoting the development of local economies to protect the general public who are being marginalized by globalization. It should not work against these goals: deepen social divisions and use politics to tear Taiwan asunder.
Ma has given us four years of broken promises and now he is talking about how he will create a “golden decade.” Who dares believe him?
Steve Wang is an advisory committee member of the Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath