The World Economic Forum (WEF) released its Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012 on Sept. 7. Taiwan’s high global competitiveness ranking remained unchanged at No. 13, outperforming both South Korea at No. 24 and China at No. 26.
According to Government Information Office (GIO) Minister Philip Yang (楊永明), the high ranking shows that the government’s policy direction is correct. This official attitude makes it abundantly clear that the administration is neither capable nor willing to review itself. The fact is that Taiwan has always been given a good ranking by the WEF and in 2005, under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, it ranked No. 8.
A responsible government’s first reaction to the announcement of the ranking would be to compare the ranking with reality, to see if they match. What the public needs is the fruits of a “real economy,” not just an superficially impressive ranking. Unfortunately, there seems to be a gap between Taiwan’s real economy and the high WEF ranking, and that gap is ridiculously large.
Taiwan’s stock market, a window onto the nation’s economy, has always been the weakest among all Asian countries; the unemployment rate remains the highest of the Four Asian Tigers; real salaries are not only stagnant, they have returned to the level of 13 years ago; and average GDP growth over the past three years has been the lowest among East Asian countries. In addition, it was frightening to witness the extent of this decline when the financial crisis hit Taiwan.
Why is this so? The answer can be found in another international index. According to the assessment of the Business Environment Risk Intelligence (BERI), Taiwan’s overall investment environment is the world’s third best. However, the investment rate — domestic investment as a proportion of GDP — has hovered at about 20 percent and the average over the past three years is just 20.6 percent. In contrast, South Korea, which is ranked 17th in the world, has a rate of 29 percent. Insufficient domestic investment leads to a lack of economic dynamism and the loss of jobs.
What the government should do now is review its own performance. It stands to reason that with the third-best investment environment in the world, the investment rate in Taiwan should be at least 29 percent or more. Why, then, do local businesses choose not to invest and foreign investors not to rush to invest in Taiwan? What is the fundamental cause of the gap between Taiwan and South Korea in the area of investment?
The crux of the matter is that Taiwan’s “China fever” has overheated, resulting in Taiwanese businesspeople channeling too much investment into China. Since the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), in particular, Taiwanese investment in China had increased by 102 percent to US$12.23 billion at the end of last year.
A market estimate implies that real investment is twice the amount officially approved by the Investment Commission of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, US$24.46 billion, or the equivalent of 5.79 percent of last year’s GDP of US$430.5 billion.
Obviously, the gap between these indexes and the real economy is a result of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) pro-China policies. In other words, his administration is going in completely the wrong direction. As long as the government’s pro-China policies do not change, the real economy will continue to decline, regardless of how many top rankings we receive.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing