Recent incidents that should never have occurred among healthcare and security workers have exposed consistent negligence and incompetence on the part of the supposed professionals who have been trained to serve and protect the public in various ways.
In July, a Chinese tourist somehow managed to reach past President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) security detail, assigned by the National Security Bureau, at the National Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall in Taipei and place her hand around his neck to embrace him. Then, on Aug. 23 at a Fo Guang Shan Monastery event in Greater Kaohsiung, an unauthorized person appeared onstage behind Ma before he was removed by security personnel. Security staff once again exhibited inadequacies when at an event in Greater Taichung a woman somehow managed to rush onto a stage to protest a medical dispute ruling, grabbing Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) arm before being asked to leave.
In less than two months, there were three reported security breaches that compromised the safety of either the president or the opposition’s presidential candidate. This does not even include previous incidents in which Chinese tourists have entered Taiwanese military bases and facilities without undergoing security checks.
Thankfully, nothing happened to Ma or Tsai and their safety remains intact despite the apparent neglect of those assigned to protect them. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the five transplant recipients who were given organs from an HIV-positive donor last month after National Taiwan University Hospital staff failed horrendously to follow standard medical protocol.
One should never expect to hear of a complete lack of oversight or lack of due deligence — or of an act of negligence that is way beyond comprehension — at any healthcare facility.
Procedures in these areas, involving people’s lives and safety, are developed for a reason: to avoid potentially catastrophic fiascoes. If these professionals cannot be bothered to follow them, what is the point of developing them in the first place?
Alas, a revamp of the system does not seem likely any time soon. This type of negligence is practically encouraged by the government given the paltry fines the responsible hospitals, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Cheng Kung University Hospital, incurred. These incidents display a system that lacks much-needed accountability.
Add to this a Chinese--language Apple Daily report last month about four doctors at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital who scrambled for protective masks during an emergency situation while they allowed a pregnant anesthesiologist to be exposed to the patient’s blood before informing her that the patient had HIV. If this story is true, the doctors’ display of cowardice is more evidence of a potential crisis in which the nation’s healthcare workers are shirking their duties and responsibilities.
Imagine the repercussions had Ma or Tsai been harmed as a result of their security staff’s mental vacations. Couple that scenario with the organ transplant snafus at one of the nation’s top hospitals, and other countries might start wondering whether Taiwan is capable of properly tending to matters of importance.
For a country as isolated as Taiwan, whose unenviable reputation around the globe for fistfights in the legislature is legendary, the negligence and incompetence of those professionals in the security and healthcare sectors risk reducing Taiwan to a perennial laughing stock.
Talk about losing face.
Ted Chang is a copy editor at the Taipei Times.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath