Having a brawl
The article about the recent brouhaha over reporter Cameron Abadi’s criticism of Taiwan’s legislature in a Foreign Policy piece explained very clearly why lawmakers in Taipei were upset about the claims (“Lawmakers refute article’s claim they are failing Taiwan,” Aug. 11, page 3).
“Legislators from across the political spectrum ... rebutted a US magazine’s criticism of the legislature’s performance, claiming that conflicts are just part of the democratic progress,” the article said, adding that the Foreign Policy article, titled “Parliamentary Funk,” “also named Belgium, Iraq, Japan and Afghanistan as having sub-par legislatures.”
However, it seems that Abadi — as well as his critics in both the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — would have benefited from reading a 2007 account from a Reuters dispatch by Ralph Jennnings headlined: “Legislature brawls are staged.” That 2007 article explained what many people in Taiwan have long suspected: The brawls in the legislature are staged so that politicians can garner media attention and curry favor with voters.
One wonders if Abadi did his research, instead of shooting first and asking questions later.
He would have learned that, according to Jennings’ article, “the brawling and histrionics in parliament that have put Taiwan politics on the world map for the past 20 years are staged acts, legislators and political observers say,” and that “they are planned in advance to generate media attention and garner favor with voters who like to see their representatives fight as hard as they can on tough issues.”
Jennings’ piece also added that “lawmakers even call up allies to ask that they wear sports shoes ahead of the choreographed clashes. They have been known to meet up afterwards for drinks.”
Former KMT legislator Joanna Lei (雷倩) could have told Abadi what she told Jennings: “It’s really a media event, staged for media coverage. They have a strategy session, like a war plan.”
Abadi might have further learned from reading the story that “in the 1980s and 1990s, when minority parties had no procedural way to change governing bodies controlled then by the KMT, regular fights exposed inefficiency, crookedness and authoritarianism, [according to] Shelley Rigger, an East Asian politics expert at Davidson College in the United States.”
“It’s true that politicians use [brawls] to excite their core supporters at home, but it’s unclear how effective that is,” Rigger was quoted by Jennings as saying. “We do know, though, that it hurts the legitimacy of the democratic system as a whole. Mostly it’s a delaying tactic.”
A few legislators admitted to Jennings that the staged fights were “just a ploy to win votes.” One politician, then-People First Party lawmaker Lee Hung-chun (李鴻鈞), was quoted as saying: “They just want to steal the spotlight going into the primaries. Parliament should be a sacred and noble place.”
So it seems as if both Abadi and his DPP-KMT critics got it all wrong. The fights and screaming shout fests are staged, pre-arranged and all in good fun.
Welcome to Taiwan, Mr Abadi.
ARRON BECK
Kenting
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath