Alan Shadrake’s career sparked into life when he uprooted his young family and relocated to Berlin shortly after the wall went up in 1961. Now the 76-year-old great-grandfather is enjoying a new lease of life after being imprisoned for writing a book that dared to criticize the judiciary in Singapore.
“I took two suitcases to Berlin, all the stuff I needed,” he said when we meet at his daughter’s house in Essex, England. “And I came back from Singapore with two suitcases and nothing of my life in between — no houses, no cars, no wives.”
Shadrake has enjoyed a rip-roaring, itinerant writing career, his life shaped by the stories that he has pursued.
“What have you done now, Dad?” his children laugh when he phones them from far-flung destinations.
However, Shadrake’s family feared his determination to expose injustice in Singapore was an adventure too far. When he was found guilty of contempt of court last year for claims in his bestselling book, Once a Jolly Hangman, his youngest daughter e-mailed to ask: “Will they hang you, Dad?” They did not, but Shadrake has only recently been freed — and deported back to Britain — after five weeks in Changi prison.
Shadrake is still recovering from his imprisonment.
“It was a pretty horrendous experience,” he said.
However, he looks younger than his years. He began as a 15-year-old on the Hornchurch and Upminster News and worked his way up to the Daily Express in Manchester before moving to Berlin. There he filed stories for all the UK papers and wrote a book about the people-smuggling racket created by the wall. Later, he moved to Los Angeles and Las Vegas, writing showbiz features for British tabloids.
After his third wife died, Shadrake was just about to go to Cuba when a journalist friend phoned and asked him to write some travel stories about Singapore. So he flew to Southeast Asia. On his only night off he was sitting alone at a bar when he met a Singaporean-Chinese woman who was to become his fourth wife.
“The very morning I moved into her flat in Singapore I switched the TV on and there was an announcement about a British guy wanted for two murders who had run off to Australia,” Shadrake said.
That suspect was protected from extradition until it was guaranteed that he would not be put to death and yet Shadrake also spotted the case of Nguyen Van Tuong, a young Australian who was found guilty of heroin trafficking at Changi airport and was hanged.
“I saw it as double standards,” he said. “I thought: find a hangman and interview him.”
The hangman he eventually tracked down changed his life. Shadrake was surprised to hit it off with Darshan Singh, Singapore’s chief executioner for nearly 50 years who once executed 18 men in one day.
“We’re old codgers together,” he said. “I used to talk to him about Manchester United. He loved it.”
Shadrake envisioned a biography of Singh’s life, but as he spoke to more local people he became convinced the judicial system did not always deliver justice. And so Once a Jolly Hangman tells of a judiciary that embraced the death penalty for murder, drug trafficking and firearms offenses. Singapore only recently started revealing its execution rates — killing six criminals in 2008 and five in 2009 — and Shadrake argued the death penalty disproportionately applied to the young and the poor, while high-ranking criminals, wealthy foreigners and well-connected drug lords escaped.
By the time the book was published, Shadrake had moved to Malaysia. He suspected his book would upset the Singaporean authorities, but daringly ignored a warning from the British High Commission not to return to Singapore for his book launch. The evening before he flew in, he called his eldest daughter, Kim, and, with typical black humor, told her he was having his “last dinner.” She joked: “Make sure it’s a good one, it may be your last for a long time.”
Inside the launch party, 150 diplomats and activists toasted Shadrake’s book. Outside, police circled in unmarked cars.
At 6:30am the next morning, Shadrake was woken in his hotel room by four police officers who ordered him to get dressed. He was interrogated for more than 10 hours a day for five days, a vent of cold air angled at his neck. An officer opened a copy of his book and repeatedly asked him why he wrote certain sections.
“It was a bit ridiculous. I said: ‘This book is true,’” he said.
Twice Shadrake was given the chance to publicly apologize before his trial and sentencing. He was also asked to promise not to impugn the integrity of Singapore’s judiciary again.
“I suddenly thought, what is this all about? I’m going to apologize and they’ll let me go? Then I thought, I’m not going to apologize. They had fallen into their own trap. They had got me and they didn’t know what to do. They had caused this global outcry. I was nobody and I’m nobody now but I’ve just become famous through their stupidity,” he said.
Facing 14 charges for “scandalizing the judiciary” — in essence, writing a critical book that could undermine public faith in Singapore’s judicial system — Shadrake became a global media story.
He was found guilty of nine charges and sentenced to six weeks’ imprisonment and a S$20,000 (US$16,600) fine. Shadrake, who has heart problems and chronic back pain from a slipped disc, was forced to sleep on a hard floor with only a couple of thin blankets, just along from the prisoners on death row.
He fell ill and was rushed to hospital — chained to the bed — and put on a drip. His care improved, he said, when he warned the authorities it would be a public relations disaster for them if he was photographed arriving back in Britain in a wheelchair.
Before he went into jail, Shadrake made a vow: “When I come out, I’m going to continue to be a thorn in the side of the Singapore authorities for as long as I live.”
He is proud of what he considers his best work in his 50-year career and has “no regrets.”
After recuperating in Britain he will return to Malaysia, where his book has sold 10,000 copies — many to traders who have smuggled it into Singapore, where his book is not officially banned, but is, mysteriously, unavailable in any shops.
“The Singapore government scored an own-goal by persecuting Alan. His book has drawn the international spotlight to Singapore’s use of the death penalty,” said Lance Lattig, Southeast Asia researcher at Amnesty International. “When it comes to drug trafficking, Singapore operates an institutionalized system of unfair trials with automatic presumption of guilt and a mandatory death penalty. Singapore doesn’t recognize the universal right to free speech. Instead, the government tightens or loosens restrictions on free speech as it pleases.”
Shadrake is in touch with human rights activists and Singaporean dissidents who have been energized by his book. He hopes that repression, injustice and the lack of separation between executive power and the judiciary in Singapore — criticisms that so inflamed the authorities — will come crumbling down just as surely as the Berlin Wall did.
“It’s going to be very slow. It might take 10 years but there are definitely changes going on. It’s moving in the right direction now,” he said. “I’ve had tremendous support in Singapore. I’m not a hero but I’m treated like one.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath