Last weekend, the Taiwan Rural Front and farmers from all over the country held an overnight protest on Ketagalan Boulevard in front of the Presidential Office in Taipei. It was the second such demonstration, the first having taken place exactly one year ago.
The repeat protest is a cause for celebration and anxiety among farmers’ supporters. What is worth celebrating is that farmers are gradually growing stronger as a force in their own right. They have shown that they can sustain a vigorous movement, keep watch on the government and make their voices heard when it breaks its promises. What makes people anxious, on the other hand, is that the central government’s response to farmers’ demands consists mostly of stopgap measures and pledges made in bad faith. The government seems incapable of coming up with any effective and realistic policies.
Starting from the overnight sit-in on Ketagalan Boulevard in July last year, the farmers — who had put up with and given in to various land enclosure laws before — have demonstrated that they are not willing to give in and stay silent anymore. A fertile farmland is the most basic requirement for rural livelihood, and farmers in many places around the country have joined together to defend that land by forming local groups and a national alliance. They are determined to resist wanton expropriations of farmland by the government in the name of development and for the benefit of big business.
The farmers’ unity and determination have, in turn, moved many other citizens, including academics and students, to come out and support them and stand shoulder to shoulder with them. This past year has seen various struggles in which farmers and people from various other sectors have supported one another through self-organized protests. Two examples are the opposition to the construction of the Kuokuang Petrochemical complex on the coast of Changhua County and the successful fight by residents of Wanbao Borough (灣寶) in Miaoli County’s Houlong Township (後龍) against expropriation of their land to give way to the expansion of the science park. Such scenes are an expression of Taiwan’s gradually maturing civic society, and this movement is the deepest and most incisive force confronting the plutocratic political setup that has long been the norm in the country. It is something we should cherish and the most direct form of support is to take part in protest demonstrations.
Government’s apparent failure to understand the role public offices are supposed to play is a cause for worry. All the government has to offer in response to the protesters’ demands is stopgap measures, buck-passing, disorganization and chaos.
In Taiwan, power is distributed among the central and local governments, and this allows the central government to shrug off its own political responsibilities, all in the name of “local autonomy.” However, local governments are constrained by an electoral system in which local factions exert a great deal of influence and pressure. Local governments have been accustomed to expropriating farmland and setting up industrial zones all over the place to chalk up short-term political accomplishments, and this practice has seriously eroded the nation’s self-sufficiency in food and damaged its ecology.
The role of the central government should be to intervene by exerting its authority through macroeconomic control and preventing land enclosure that kills off agriculture for the sake of short-term advantage and quick profits.
National leaders should not just sit on their hands while local governments bury the prospects for sustainable development in Taiwan. In supporting the farmers, we are also trying to ensure that we still have enough to eat in the future. In light of the recent food scare, the central government should carry out its duty to make sure that food is healthy and safe.
What we don’t need is ministers trying to fob off public protest with glib comments, as Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) is inclined to do.
A full year has passed since the first overnight sit-in protest on Ketagalan Boulevard, and during this period the government has repeatedly broken the promises it made back then. We have to ask whether, a year from now, the farmers will have to take to the streets once more, their hearts heavy with disappointment. When will our leaders break their habit of responding by passing the buck and offering Band-Aid solutions whenever farmers come out in protest? We need leaders whose starting point and highest purpose is the well-being of people at the grassroots. We need leaders who have the guts to say “no” to big business and who strive to build a truly democratic, just and sustainable Taiwan.
Hsia Hsiao-chuan is a professor and director of the Graduate Institute for Social Transformation Studies at Shih Hsin University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS