He was knighted by Italian dictator Benito Mussolini for his prophetic meteorological skills and now Internet rumors have revived acclaim for Raffaele Bendandi, an Italian seismologist who died in 1979, but decided that May 11, 2011, would be the day that Rome would be obliterated by an earthquake. His theory that the movement of the planets triggered seismic activity caused him to successfully predict an earthquake that killed 1,000 people in 1923. However, Paola Lagorio, president of a foundation that is dedicated to Bendandi and preserves his archives, insisted he never forecast an earthquake in Rome for May 11 this year.
As the new book History’s Worst Predictions by Eric Chaline shows, everyone from ancient prophets to modern futurologists have, more often than not, got the future spectacularly wrong.
THE MAYA
The Maya of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica were obsessed with measuring time. They had two calendars, but also deployed “the Long Count,” counting forward from the date of the creation of the world (Sept. 8, 3114 BC, since you ask). Within the Long Count, their biggest unit of time was not a year or a century but the 144,000-day B’ak’tun. Because the number 13 was significant for the Maya, the conclusion of the 13th B’ak’tun — on Dec. 21 or Dec. 23 next year — has been viewed as apocalyptic.
Regardless of the dubious logic that this should herald the end of the world, the Mayan “prophecies” gained credibility with the perception that their civilization was a peace-loving theocracy.
“The truth is that even by the standards of ancient peoples, the Maya were technologically backward,” Chaline said.
They lacked the wheel, the arch, the plough and domesticated animals; they fought each other and ruined their environment. Did the Maya foresee their own collapse in the ninth century or the Spanish invasion in the 16th? Or have cataclysmic events happen on key dates in their future-oriented calendar? No.
THE VILLAGE HERBALIST
It was an unpromising start for a soothsayer: A merchant’s son in southern France dropped out of school because of the bubonic plague and spent eight years studying rural herbs. He was then expelled from university for continuing his work as an apothecary. Perhaps Michel de Nostredame had been smoking something because in 942 rhyming verses he apparently predicted every global tragedy from Hitler to the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
In reality, Nostradamus was a poor astrologer and plagiarist who successfully wooed the credulous French ruling classes. All his supposed predictions have been deciphered retrospectively with a creative leap of the imagination. Some were inserted after the event.
THE TECHNOPHOBES
Less soothsayers and more naysayers, some experts slip up when pouring scorn on new inventions. Irish mathematician Dionysius Lardner (1793-1859) warned that 190kph trains would crush passengers’ lungs and kill them.
“Who would want to use it anyway?” asked then-US president Rutherford Hayes of the telephone in 1876.
In Britain, William Preece, later engineer-in-chief of the Post Office, remarked: “The Americans have need of the telephone, but we do not. We have plenty of messenger boys.”
Henry Morton, the first president of the Stevens Institute of Technology, feared that Thomas Edison’s lightbulb was “a fraud upon the public” and Marshall Ferdinand Fox called airplanes “interesting toys” with “no military value.”
COMPUTERS
Futurologists now use complex computer models to make predictions, but, as Chaline puts it, computers are often no better at discerning the future than “a sheep with a peculiarly shaped liver.” Then there are the predictions about computers. In 1943, the president of IBM predicted a world market “for maybe five computers.” Remember the panic over the millennium “bug” and the collapse of the banking system and all computerized civilization? After lining geeks’ pockets with US$300 billion to ensure the survival of the world as we know it, a few card machines failed to work for four days in millennial Britain, while 150 slot machines conked out in Delaware.
THE MONEY TALKERS
Apart from weather forecasters, the most maligned futurologists of the modern era must be economists. We accept that politics will always be a confusing mess and that culture is unreadable (rock ’n’ roll will not outlast one summer, said Variety magazine in 1955), but we still — irrationally — expect data-crunching market gurus to be more reliable. Days before the Wall Street Crash in 1929, economist Irving Fisher reassured the public that stock prices had reached “a permanently high plateau.” And did we really believe then-UK finance minister Gordon Brown in 2007 that his government would not “return to the old boom and bust?”
The future is not just a foreign country. It is another world altogether. Viewed through a skeptical prism, climate change science, peak oil and all other contemporary fears are merely the latest in a long line of gloomy prophecies by modern doom-mongers. However, unrelenting scorn for every prediction is a form of lethargy that abandons the precautionary principle, ignores scientific warnings that have been proved correct and leads to a disastrous lack of long-term planning. Fears for the future may, just, help keep us honest. However, if Rome has been reduced to rubble by the time you read this, you can add my name to the pantheon of great misreaders of the march of history.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath