No one has ever accused the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of having a sense of humor. Looks like no one will for a while longer, either.
Several party lawmakers were stewing this week about a tongue-in-cheek article on the CNNGo.com Web site headlined “Asia’s most sinful cities” — a takeoff from the Catholic Church’s list of seven deadly sins as declared by Pope Gregory the Great: pride, envy, anger, sadness (which the church renamed “sloth” in the 17th century), avarice, gluttony and lust.
The top spot on the article’s list went to Taipei — for gluttony — which had KMT members of the legislature’s Education and Culture Committee rushing to defend Taipei and the nation’s honor. It’s just too bad that neither they nor new Government Information Office Minister Philip Yang (楊永明) had apparently spent the two weeks since the offending article was first posted either really reading the story or getting a good translation.
KMT Legislator Kuo Su-chun (郭素春) said she couldn’t “stand the idea that we are described as gluttonous. Saying that Taipei is a city of gluttony is definitely not praise for its delicacies.”
Once again, Kuo was too quick to criticize — remember that she lambasted St John’s University students last month for not standing up when asking President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) questions, even though they were seated in a lecture hall where the microphones were all fixed to the desks.
The CNNGo story did not say that Taipei is a city of gluttony or that its residents (and by extension all Taiwanese) were gluttons.
It said Taipei was a good place to go if one wanted to “be” gluttonous because of the wide variety of food and plentiful offerings available day and night, especially at the “18 streets dedicated to nothing but food.”
Yang said he had asked his office’s Department of International Information to communicate the government’s concerns to CNN, noting that despite the article’s “bantering style,” it had affected the nation’s image “to some extent.”
He also said that Taipei was a place where visitors could enjoy gourmet food.
Complaining to CNN won’t achieve much when the fault lies closer to home. It’s not just CNN that is promoting Taipei as a place to come eat cheaply and often; it’s also the Tourism Bureau and the Taipei City Government’s own Web sites.
The bureau’s site brags that “snacking is deeply woven into the fabric of daily life in Taiwan ... in fact, one of the quickest ways to experience the local flavor of Taiwan is visit one of the many night markets,” while the city’s sites highlight fine dining, night market meals and the annual Beef Noodle Festival.
Is this more a case of a job being done too well? If the KMT lawmakers and the government don’t want Taipei to be known as a place for great (and cheap) food, then they shouldn’t authorize spending time and money advertising the fact.
However, perhaps the lawmakers might have been mollified if they had searched “Taipei” on the CNNGo.com Web site, since the first story that pops up is by a Singaporean columnist titled “7 ways Taipei beats Singapore” — a paean to Taiwanese street food, Taipei’s MRT system, the politeness of residents and the cleanliness of the city, as well as the High Speed Rail system and Taiwan’s freedom of speech.
Or perhaps not. The article ends (humorously) with the note that there is one thing better about Singapore than Taipei/Taiwan — its lawmakers aren’t famed for fighting in parliament and throwing chairs.
After all, the one thing Taiwan is more famous for than its food is the combativeness of its legislators.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath