Is the EPA earning its keep?
What useless thing is the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) going to do next? I laughed with schadenfreude when six months ago they had a “crackdown” on scooter tailpipes that point upward, blowing carcinogenic smoke into the trailing drivers’ faces. Drivers could have seen “heavy fines” if they didn’t get their tailpipe adjusted to point ... downward. Great. That’s progress. Thanks, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
And are police ticketing violators or are grassroots groups supporting this initiative? Not that I see on my daily bicycle commute. What changed? I don’t support the death penalty, but I observe that the EPA’s policies are in effect driving their own children to an early death. Along with oil, Earth’s human life expectancy rates have hit a peak and are expected to crash over the next 15 years worldwide.
Now the EPA is announcing a “crackdown” on large noise-polluting motorbikes, according to a very forgiving Shelley Shan (“EPA to crack down next month on large motorbikes that cause noise pollution,” April 11, page 2). Why am I not surprised that the EPA is doing nothing about air pollution? No matter that Joanne Rosen contracted asthma and must flee Taiwan for safer air (Letters, April 6, page 8). I’ve been making the same plea to drivers for years to turn off their scooters at long lights.
According to the story, this noise pollution is caused by “bikers who gather or race,” and I myself have seen this phenomenon in person while on mountain biking trips, including zooming parades of imported Italian and German sports cars on provincial highways. With fond memories of having my own sports car in Taiwan, I would happily do the same thing, but I agree that motorists should make sure they’re not too loud.
Meanwhile, what is the EPA doing about garbage trucks? From my sixth-floor balcony, Fur Elise gets blasted at me for a full hour every evening, three times in my neighborhood. My measurements suggest that it’s 75 decibels (dB) inside my apartment and even if I turn my guitar amplifier up to 11, I still can’t drown that darn song out.
Standing next to it, my slow-moving local garbage truck pumps out more than 115dB, which is more than enough to deafen both the helpless children in nearby strollers and those in the womb.
Rosen is completely correct when she pleads that Taiwanese begin, finally, to wake up and take care of our precious children. Did you know that in the US, one out of five teenagers of college entry age is ... deaf?
According to Shan’s story, members of the public should report offending vehicles, and so I would encourage the public to send in the license plate numbers of their local garbage and recycling trucks to the EPA. When you live in any place in Taiwan for a week, how do you not know when it’s coming?
Finally, aren’t speeding motorcycles and racing sports cars on the provincial highways a matter for the police to deal with? This all begs the question: Does Taiwan have any CCTV cameras that are connected to electricity?
TORCH PRATT
Yonghe
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS