No more ‘Chinese Taipei’
Your article about the use of “Chinese Taipei” (“Reporter’s Notebook: ‘Chinese Taipei’? Don’t You Mean ‘Taiwan?’” Nov. 14, 2010, page 3) superbly underscored and drove home with a vengeance the absolute and utter inanity of the denigrating and humiliating moniker.
This cretinous, filthy epithet absolutely must be done away with. I have difficulty finding words that are adequate in describing the risible absurdity of the label.
The core issue is that “Chinese Taipei” is an oxymoron, and the simple truth is that the term refers to absolutely no place on Earth.
What would people’s reaction be if I spoke of “Spanish Vienna,” “German Paris” or “Romanian Lisbon?” People would think that I was extremely brain-damaged or totally insane.
The term “Chinese Taipei” utterly defies the most basic common sense. It violates the most fundamental concept of human language, one of which — by the way — is found in the Confucian principle of the “Rectification of Names.” To say “Chinese Taipei” is like calling a horse a sow, or a camel a rabbit.
I cringe every time I read the term, “Chinese Taipei.” This term is abhorrent, disgraceful, and disgusting.
Please allow me to ask another question: Would it make any more sense to turn the tables around, and refer to “Taiwanese Beijing?” How do you think the Chinese would react to that? After all both the Chinese Communist Party and their pandering, toady lackeys in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) both make the claim that “it’s all one country.”
If it is truly one country — as both the Chinese Communists and the KMT insist, then it should make absolutely no difference at all whether this supposedly “one China” is called “Chinese Taipei” or “Taiwanese Beijing.”
There are people who will say that the name “Taiwanese Beijing” is ludicrous, but this only serves to prove my point that the inane moniker of “Chinese Taipei” is no less risible.
I find a certain poignancy in the question asked by a customs official at Tokyo International Airport.
“You are from Taiwan, but why do you say you are from ‘Chinese Taipei?’” he said.
Indeed. Why are these people from Taiwan forced to say that they are from “Chinese Taipei?”
We all know very well the reason why. It’s all China’s doing, in collusion with the KMT.
However, someone, somehow has to put an end to this nonsense.
Someone has to say: “This stops now; it ain’t going any further.”
And now, dear reader, if you will most kindly excuse me, I have to rush to catch a plane — to Albanian Washington.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
Japan thanks Taiwan
I know from the news on the Internet that you have kindly sent Japan ￥1 billion (US$11.8 million) in aid. Of course, even a small sum is appreciated by us.
Anyway, I would like to say that I appreciate your help.
In my case, my family and myself are all safe because we live in Saitama, near Tokyo.
I know that your government offered to send us your rescue team, but our -government refused it because of the Chinese government. I am very sorry our government did so.
I think that in the case of such a huge disaster we must help each other as fellow human beings, despite the interference of any governments. If you suffer such a disaster, we know we are obligated to help.
Newspapers said the earthquake happened at 2:46pm and caused no damage, but at 3:20pm, the tsunami destroyed all of the northern area of Japan.
This month we have experienced a major catastrophe, but this experience will make us stronger, not only for us but also for you and all the world.
It would be easy for you to forget the disaster as time passes, but I think that the experience should make all countries stronger.
Your country is also an island country in the Pacific Ocean, so please learn from our experience to save yourselves, to make a happy country.
Thank you so much from the bottom of my heart. I love you.
Best regards,
YOSHIAKI TSUZUKI
Saitama, Japan
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
Yesterday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), once the dominant political party in Taiwan and the historic bearer of Chinese republicanism, officially crowned Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as its chairwoman. A former advocate for Taiwanese independence turned Beijing-leaning firebrand, Cheng represents the KMT’s latest metamorphosis — not toward modernity, moderation or vision, but toward denial, distortion and decline. In an interview with Deutsche Welle that has now gone viral, Cheng declared with an unsettling confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “not a dictator,” but rather a “democratically elected leader.” She went on to lecture the German journalist that Russia had been “democratized
RSS