No more ‘Chinese Taipei’
Your article about the use of “Chinese Taipei” (“Reporter’s Notebook: ‘Chinese Taipei’? Don’t You Mean ‘Taiwan?’” Nov. 14, 2010, page 3) superbly underscored and drove home with a vengeance the absolute and utter inanity of the denigrating and humiliating moniker.
This cretinous, filthy epithet absolutely must be done away with. I have difficulty finding words that are adequate in describing the risible absurdity of the label.
The core issue is that “Chinese Taipei” is an oxymoron, and the simple truth is that the term refers to absolutely no place on Earth.
What would people’s reaction be if I spoke of “Spanish Vienna,” “German Paris” or “Romanian Lisbon?” People would think that I was extremely brain-damaged or totally insane.
The term “Chinese Taipei” utterly defies the most basic common sense. It violates the most fundamental concept of human language, one of which — by the way — is found in the Confucian principle of the “Rectification of Names.” To say “Chinese Taipei” is like calling a horse a sow, or a camel a rabbit.
I cringe every time I read the term, “Chinese Taipei.” This term is abhorrent, disgraceful, and disgusting.
Please allow me to ask another question: Would it make any more sense to turn the tables around, and refer to “Taiwanese Beijing?” How do you think the Chinese would react to that? After all both the Chinese Communist Party and their pandering, toady lackeys in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) both make the claim that “it’s all one country.”
If it is truly one country — as both the Chinese Communists and the KMT insist, then it should make absolutely no difference at all whether this supposedly “one China” is called “Chinese Taipei” or “Taiwanese Beijing.”
There are people who will say that the name “Taiwanese Beijing” is ludicrous, but this only serves to prove my point that the inane moniker of “Chinese Taipei” is no less risible.
I find a certain poignancy in the question asked by a customs official at Tokyo International Airport.
“You are from Taiwan, but why do you say you are from ‘Chinese Taipei?’” he said.
Indeed. Why are these people from Taiwan forced to say that they are from “Chinese Taipei?”
We all know very well the reason why. It’s all China’s doing, in collusion with the KMT.
However, someone, somehow has to put an end to this nonsense.
Someone has to say: “This stops now; it ain’t going any further.”
And now, dear reader, if you will most kindly excuse me, I have to rush to catch a plane — to Albanian Washington.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
Japan thanks Taiwan
I know from the news on the Internet that you have kindly sent Japan ￥1 billion (US$11.8 million) in aid. Of course, even a small sum is appreciated by us.
Anyway, I would like to say that I appreciate your help.
In my case, my family and myself are all safe because we live in Saitama, near Tokyo.
I know that your government offered to send us your rescue team, but our -government refused it because of the Chinese government. I am very sorry our government did so.
I think that in the case of such a huge disaster we must help each other as fellow human beings, despite the interference of any governments. If you suffer such a disaster, we know we are obligated to help.
Newspapers said the earthquake happened at 2:46pm and caused no damage, but at 3:20pm, the tsunami destroyed all of the northern area of Japan.
This month we have experienced a major catastrophe, but this experience will make us stronger, not only for us but also for you and all the world.
It would be easy for you to forget the disaster as time passes, but I think that the experience should make all countries stronger.
Your country is also an island country in the Pacific Ocean, so please learn from our experience to save yourselves, to make a happy country.
Thank you so much from the bottom of my heart. I love you.
Best regards,
YOSHIAKI TSUZUKI
Saitama, Japan
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS