About half a century ago, the sociologist Robert Merton coined the term “self-fulfilling prophecy.”
According to Merton, a “self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of the situation,” but because people choose to believe in the prophecy, it evokes a new behavior that directly or indirectly causes the resulting situation to coincide with the prophecy, and it will thus “make the original false conception come ‘true.’”
Similar ideas existed in ancient China: One example is the expression “three men a tiger make,” which tells of how rumors about tigers convinced people that there really was a tiger, although there never was one in the first place. Self-fulfilling prophecies are quite common in our daily lives. As teachers, for example, we often encourage our students, who are then stimulated and often improve.
Self-fulfilling prophecies work not only at an individual level, but often also have a psychological effect on groups, and as such they can play a major part in social or historical change. Rumor is often rife in a society prior to major change, and this is one example of how self-fulfilling prophecies work on groups. Looking at the calls for a “Jasmine Revolution” in China today based on the relationship between group psychology and social change, another significant aspect appears, and that is that these calls are forcing the government to create such a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) main concern is stability. By suppressing freedom of expression and blocking the Internet, it is creating a false impression of stability. Ironically, it is the CCP that has been the main destabilizing factor with its response to Jasmine Revolution-inspired incidents. Although three waves of calls for jasmine-style protests failed to mobilize many people, the sheer size of the police forces mobilized by the government as a response was astonishing and rather absurd to behold. Not only did the authorities seal off venues in Beijing, Shanghai and other big cities, they also organized street patrols consisting of neighborhood committees and other organizations that maintain public order at the grassroots level. At universities and other sensitive institutions, they also began urgently disseminating propaganda. This created a tense atmosphere around the country. The only result of this excessive response was to tell the whole country that something is about to go wrong in China.
Stability predominantly comes from a feeling of stability among the public. Unrest begins with a feeling of unrest in their minds. If the authorities repeatedly create an atmosphere of tension at a time when outsiders all agree that the CCP will be able to maintain its highly suppressive rule and that its position will not be shaken for the foreseeable future, this holds the seeds of a self-fulfilling prophecy about instability. If this atmosphere is extended for a longer period of time, it will take root among the general public, who will naturally begin to take a more active interest in the instability. When everyone begins to feel that something is about to happen in China, any small issue is much more likely to set off a major crisis. In other words, if a prediction of instability spreads among the public, that instability will sooner or later become real. This is precisely what a self-fulfilling prophecy means.
By itself, the Jasmine Revolution may not have been able to create this self-fulfilling prophecy, but it has succeeded in forcing the government into an excessive reaction and this has resulted in the creation of such a prophecy. This is necessary for a revolution to break out. Unknowingly, the Chinese communist authorities have dug their own grave.
Wang Dan is a visiting assistant professor at National Tsing Hua University.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing