Alive and well? Look again
Dennis Hickey’s piece indicates that he may need to leave Missouri and get a little updating on what has been happening in Taiwan and Asia in the past decades (“ROC is alive and well in Taiwan,” March 21, page 8).
It is questionable that the world will be celebrating the 100th anniversary of the revolution that “overthrew the Qing Dynasty and led to the establishment of the Republic of China [ROC].”
Certainly, the 1.3 billion people in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will celebrate on Oct. 1 — the anniversary of the PRC’s establishment — rather than the ROC’s Double Ten National Day on Oct. 10.
Of those people in the PRC, it is doubtful that the Tibetans, Uighurs and Mongolians care about the PRC or the ROC. They wish for a restoration of their own land. In Taiwan, the ROC government is downplaying any talk of joint celebrations with the PRC. Add to that the fact that many Taiwanese look back knowing that in 1911, their land was a colony of Japan and that the 1911 revolution in China means little to them.
Further, they are knowledgeable that the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which entered into force in 1952, did not give their land to either the PRC or the ROC. If Taiwanese are going to celebrate any year, they may prefer 1987, which they see as the overthrow of the one-party state of the ROC with the lifting of martial law and the end of the White Terror era.
Or they may look to 1996 as the year to celebrate since it is the year that a true democracy finally came to Taiwan. Also, if Hickey was to keep up with recent polls and surveys, he would see that a growing number of people in Taiwan identify themselves as Taiwanese and not Chinese.
They have no desire to be linked to the “mainland area” that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) tries to claim as theirs under the 1947 ROC Constitution. As a matter of fact, they would prefer to jettison that outdated and imposed Constitution and even seek to change the name of their country. It is only the nostalgic waishengren community in Taiwan that cares about 1911, and even then, not all of them necessarily do.
JEROME KEATING
Taipei
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is often accused of getting close to, and even conspiring with, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). There are certainly good reasons behind these accusations, yet the confounding truth is that it makes neither historical nor logical sense for it to do so. Whether one believes that the Chinese civil war fought between the KMT and CCP in the previous century has ended or has yet to be resolved, the KMT’s retreat to Taiwan in 1949 resulted in the CCP governing China and the KMT taking root in Taiwan. For years, the KMT refused to even
RSS