Last year, China gave notice that it was serious about enforcing its writ over the Asia-Pacific region through a series of strong political and military moves.
Clearly, developments in the region last year when China threatened Japan, detained Vietnamese fishermen, claimed all of the South China Sea and warned the US off the Yellow Sea is obviously Beijing’s version of asserting its historical role as the old Middle Kingdom..
Meanwhile, some Chinese generals made strong statements about their country’s rapidly expanding economic interests and the need for a commensurate navy to protect such interests.
All this created further alarm among China’s neighbors, which brought them closer to the US.
China subsequently toned down its rhetoric, but the reality remains that it is continuing its military buildup.
Its defense budget this year will rise by 12.6 percent to a total of 601 billion yuan (US$88.8 billion). The US estimated the Chinese military budget to be US$150 billion in 2009.
Such an increase in China’s defense budget year after year will only exacerbate the nervousness of its neighbors.
At a time when China’s leadership is jumpy about rising social discontent in the country compounded by the example of people power in the Middle East, its growing armory is dangerous both for its own people and regional stability.
We know from the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989 that the Chinese leadership will not hesitate to kill their own people when challenged with a threat to their monopoly on power.
They have already intensified a crackdown on dissent by rounding up activists, threatening foreign journalists and massively censoring all news from print and Internet sources on developments in the Middle East.
Faced with internal challenge to their rule, China’s rulers might resort to the nationalist card by playing up the foreign threat to national “sovereignty” in Taiwan and elsewhere in the region.
Bereft of popular legitimacy at home, nationalism is a great draw card, selectively used now and then against Japan and the US.
For the world, though, it is China’s growing military power that is going to be a problem in the years to come.
Of even greater danger is its growing nuclear arsenal. According to WikiLeaks, Ma Xiaotian (馬曉天), deputy chief of the Chinese army, reportedly told his US interlocutors in June 2008 that the growth of China’s nuclear forces was an “imperative reality.”
He asserted that there could be “no limit on technical progress.”
Ma also rejected US calls for transparency, saying: “It is impossible for [China] to change its decades-old way of doing business to become transparent using the US model.”
Even as China keeps growing its military power and throwing its weight around the region and the wider world, it still swears that it has no hegemonic ambitions.
If China were just going about its business peacefully and without threatening its neighbors, why are its neighbors feeling disquiet, if not alarm, about its role?
For example, Vietnam is developing closer links with the US and Japan is reinforcing its defense links with the US.
In addition, Australia’s 2009 white paper on defense clearly pointed to a strategic threat from China by about 2030.
It said that between 2020 and 2030, China is expected to overtake the US as the world’s largest economy, which will in turn “affect the distribution of strategic power,” with China increasingly able to throw its weight around.
Of course, this assumes that China’s rulers will continue to exercise unfettered power over their people, which seems overly optimistic considering that the Internet is buzzing with messages for people to gather together in protests along the lines of “people power” in Tunisia and Egypt.
Indeed, the regime is so jittery that it is pouncing on foreign journalists to stop them “stirring things up.”
According to renowned Chinese activist-artist Ai Wei Wei (艾未未): “Many universities will not allow students to come out [for any kind of gathering], mainly because teachers have received a certain note ordering them to do their duty, otherwise they will be in trouble. So the country is very tight right now.”
This does not look like a country whose leadership is confident and at ease.
That is easier to understand in light of Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao’s (溫家寶) admission to the recent National People’s Congress that people are greatly resentful of corruption, land grabs and rising prices. Worryingly for the Chinese leadership these are exactly the kind of issues that have ignited the popular upheaval in the Middle East.
No wonder the authorities are edgy and rounding up everyone who might appear subversive. In this context the foreign media are particularly dangerous because of their reporting of the people’s revolutions in the Middle East.
China is a troubled country and its seamless rise is highly problematic.
At the same time, the anticipated US decline is not a foregone conclusion. The US could still confound its critics by staging a significant recovery.
Besides, other regional political actors like Japan, Russia and India are certain to contest China’s dominance.
Sushil Seth is a writer based in Australia.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath