Is Taiwan the ‘Titanic’?
Two consecutive editorials (“Racing down a slippery slope,” Feb. 18, page 8, and “Caution, there is danger ahead,” Feb. 19, page 8) give a stern warning against President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) China policy toward China.
In spite of bad weather, poor light and hazardous road conditions, “Ma is practically driving at 200kph.”
At such a speed, his license should be suspended indefinitely by the Control Yuan and/or the legislature.
Ma is like “a blind man not afraid of guns” and “a man eating hastily and breaking his bowl,” in Taiwanese sayings.
Ma should realize that the “one China” route is much more hazardous than the old Beiyi (北一) Road between Taipei and Yilan, because the former must pass through the Taiwan Strait, which was once called the “Black Water River” (黑水溝) — with many unknowns including strong currents and severe typhoons.
It is a well-known fact that Ma has seldom kept his campaign promises and pledges. It must be pointed out that he is rebellious to his alma maters. He graduated from Jianguo (建國, meaning National Construction) High School, but his policy is auxiliary to China (附中, Normal University Auxiliary High School); he graduated from National Taiwan University (台大, meaning Taiwan Large), but he makes Taiwan small (台小); and he graduated from Harvard (哈佛, meaning admiring Buddha), but he admires China (哈中).
Unless Ma and his followers immediately make a U-turn away from the route to “one China” with the “1992 consensus,” Taiwan, which has been known as “the unsinkable carrier,” will become the Titanic of the Taiwan Strait.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
CCP hypocritical on rebels
Almost a hundred years ago, the people of China toppled the last dynasty of China. The Qing Dynasty faced numerous natural disasters, famine, corruptions, internal unrest and foreign invasions that the government could not deal with properly.
In 21st-century Tunisia and various other Northern African states, many parallels can be seen. Egypt faced widespread youth unemployment, low wages, high crime, government corruption and social injustice that were all comparable to late 19th and early 20th-century China.
Today’s China is a highly polarized society in which the extremely wealthy and poor communities intermingle in many megacities. There is no doubt that corruption and oppression rage in China unbeknownst to most people on the outside of the “Great Firewall” of China, but judging from the recent crackdown on dissent across China, one can clearly draw a picture of an oppressive regime that is mobilizing its forces to quell its people.
The question is, why?
During the earlier days of the Chinese Communist Revolution (and even today), historical rebels were lauded instead of denounced as traitors. These were heroes of an earlier time who stood against oppressive regimes, such as Li Zicheng (李自成), who toppled the last Ming emperor. These figures were promoted to foster anti-monarchy sentiment and served as powerful propaganda for communist China.
Yet today, Chinese authorities not only downplay the North African revolutionaries’ success, but openly put down those who support the “Jasmine Revolution.” A contradiction arises when a government supports revolution, yet punishes its own people who try to emulate such examples. Here, China’s government has again shown its true colors, and hopefully this time, the people of China will see it for themselves.
JEN-CHIEH WU
Hsinchu
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath