Most motorists take caution when they drive along windy mountainous roads. To avoid plunging into a ravine, careful drivers slow down as they go around corners and heed traffic signs, such as “Slippery when wet” and “Caution: falling rocks.” Drivers that fail to heed such signs run the risk of killing themselves, their passengers and other motorists.
Cross-strait relations are like the old highway from Taipei to Yilan County — Beiyi Road — full of twists and turns, blind corners and dangerous obstructions. A careful statesman would take heed of Taiwan’s relative strengths and weaknesses, as well as the dangers and benefits of doing business with China, before seeking to make any major changes to the status quo. Such an approach is akin to driving slowly on a dangerous road. It gives Taiwan time to change course if hidden threats suddenly appear.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was just such a driver. He embarked on negotiations with China from a standpoint of strength, not showing fear when clarifying his special “state to state” model of relations with China. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) did the same, often describing Taiwan as a sovereign, independent country — without, of course, formally declaring independence or changing the Constitution. Despite holding their ground on issues of sovereignty and democracy, neither man tried to obstruct business with China. In fact, cross-strait business boomed during their administrations.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), on the other hand, is not a cautious driver. His administration is racing down the mountain, heedless of any warning signs. Ma is practically driving blindfolded at night with no headlights in the rain at 200kph with a cliff on one side and a wall on the other against oncoming traffic. If Ma is lucky he might get away without scratching the car. If not, he could get Taiwan into the worst state it has ever been in.
Ma wants detente with China. He has trumpeted that policy since the very beginning of his administration. He insists on no preconditions with China, asks for no concessions and does whatever China wants, in the mere hope that Beijing will allow Taiwan more international space.
However, China has not come close to reciprocating. The recent diplomatic spat with the Philippines is a case in point. Chinese pressure and the Philippines’ “one China” policy meant it was in the best interest of Manila to side with Beijing by extraditing Republic of China (ROC) citizens to China instead of Taiwan. China trumped Taiwan, despite the so-called diplomatic truce. That is a pretty obvious warning sign.
Another sign that China is still keen to take control of Taiwan is the recent espionage case involving General Lo Hsien-che (羅賢哲). Military experts can only speculate as to the degree of damage done by Lo’s alleged betrayal, but it could be huge. The case could erode Taiwan’s ability to protect itself, damage US confidence in the ROC military and ultimately assist a Chinese takeover of Taiwan.
Although Lo allegedly started spying for China before Ma became president, he allegedly continued to divulge secrets throughout Ma’s time in power, despite so-called warming ties with China.
To top this off, China is developing what looks to be one of the most advanced militaries in the world. It has cruise missiles to combat US aircraft carriers, a submarine fleet, fighter jets with an edge on Taiwan’s aging fleet, an array of ballistic missiles that could hit Taiwan at any time and a huge military.
A cautious driver would heed these signs, rather than blazing down the road. Despite numerous indicators that his policy of detente is not paying off, and is actually damaging Taiwan’s interests, Ma’s economic reunification plans proceed apace.
When Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) arrives in Taiwan next week, he should be happy to see Ma’s administration kowtowing as usual.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath