Government exists to bring peace and stability to people’s lives. Politics is a vocation, a calling to safeguard a nation’s sovereignty and protect the life, property and security of its citizens. The extradition of Taiwanese to China by the Philippines flouts international convention, highlights the government’s slow, prevaricating, delusional response and exposes an uncomfortable truth. It reveals for all to see the government’s disregard and disdain for the issue of national sovereignty and the legal rights of its citizens. It also shines a harsh light on its ineptitude and dereliction of duty.
International convention dictates that judicial jurisdiction over criminal activity resides first and foremost with the territory in which it occurs. In this case, given that the Philippines chose to forgo its jurisdictional rights based on territory, it should have respected Taiwan’s rights of jurisdiction based on nationality. Any extradition of suspected felons who are Taiwanese should have been to Taiwan. Instead the Philippines chose to ignore this right of jurisdiction, and extradited Taiwanese to China.
With this precedent in place, if at any time in the future Taiwanese become involved in disputes overseas with Chinese nationals, any country can use this instance as a basis on which to send Taiwanese to China. Over time, individual cases have a habit of becoming standard procedure. This will not only seriously damage our sovereignty, it will wreak havoc on the legal rights of our citizens.
The government seems content to say that the Philippines has already expressed its goodwill, and leave the situation at that. That is simply unacceptable. We have to demand that the government take more robust action to address this grave diplomatic dereliction.
There is a proverb to the effect that he who constantly denigrates himself will come to be denigrated by others. Over the last two years the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has consistently kowtowed on issues of national sovereignty, misguidedly believing that if it shows a willingness to deal with China that Beijing will reciprocate. That position is no longer tenable. Recent events have shown it to be a resounding folly.
China is not going to give an inch on issues of sovereignty when it comes to international exchanges and that leaves little if any room for “goodwill.” That much is crystal clear.
Beijing has been pretty consistent about its position in international matters, expressed in three phrases: There is only one China in the world, the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is the sole legitimate government representing that China and Taiwan is a part of China. The PRC is not going to move even a little on these issues.
All the more reason for Taiwan, which is quite distinct from the China represented by the PRC government, to highlight the differences between itself and the PRC in every way that it can on the international scene, to shake itself free of the “one China” framework. What we should not be doing is dancing on the international stage to the tune of China’s unification PR machine.
China and the Philippines have ganged up on Taiwan and given our ears quite a boxing. Our national identity has taken quite a bruising and the legal rights of 23 million people have been trampled on. What has the government done? Very little.
To rub salt into the wounds, it is now requiring government departments to be careful when referring to China in official documents and to use such terms as “the other side of the [Taiwan] Strait” or “the mainland.” With this kind of attitude, it is little wonder that Philippines would think nothing of trampling on international convention and Taiwan’s national integrity.
Su Tseng-chang is a former premier.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath